Well, I rather hope it's number two for me.Arabesu said:Yup. If for some reason you need to dip into four classes over 9 levels, then either
1) Your just trying to cherry pick the best out of the obviously front-loaded classes,
or
2) Your character concept doesn't fit with the base and prestige classes available
reason 1 is a common powergamer trick and I have to draw the line somewhere or pretty soon it'll escalate into everyone asking me if they can play gestalt characters and then I have to adjust the challenges accordingly and the other players suffer AND spend more time in preparation than I'd like. There are enough power-gamerish options out there already, so I have to set boundaries somewhere, and in my experience this is the simplest for me to adjudicate and still provide the flexibility that the DND multi-class rules encourage.
Sounds like Hong's Markman Adept to me. Thanks for the offer, but since I don't have the Bo9S, it's really no viable alternative for me.reason 2 I can work with, pitch a concept for a custom prestige or base class and I'll work on it. If looking to go Bo9s archer, there is a single class option on the internet that may interest you but I don't have time to find it now.
Unfortunately, with the grandiose total of 1 (!) PrC for archers - and that being one that absolutely doesn't fit (OoBI) - there isn't much to choose from.
The thing is, I'm not actually lacking in feat slots, but in feats that offer anything interesting to an archer. (The really interesting options are tied up in PrCs.) And if I forego fighter, I'd be also be missing about the only ways to increase an archer's damage output per arrow (weapon specialization and ranged weapon mastery).If you are short one feat, consider ONE flaw. I have opened that option up for another PC. This might allow you to drop fighter altogether.
So, in short, I will have to revaluate the concept and ponder if an archer really makes sense.
Last edited: