I don’t think so. It may also drive off a larger audience. If the setting became super ToV specific I wouldn’t continue to support it.Integrating more tightly with the setting seems the way clones should go, to differentiate themselves
It's too bad, I really liked the Pathfinder 1e core rules. One big fat book to rule them all!I guess every D&D clone eventually gets the three book treatment
Dude, you just agreed with yourself!I agree
well, at least they are consistentDude, you just agreed with yourself!
Logically.Dude, you just agreed with yourself!
Not 100% sure what is being said here …I don’t think so. It may also drive off a larger audience. If the setting became super ToV specific I wouldn’t continue to support it.
I suggested they shouldn't be so neutral, to differentiate yourself. They are with your concept of being neutral..Not 100% sure what is being said here …
Tales of the Valiant is Kobold Press’s new RPG, Midgard is the official campaign setting.
The big core ToV books (Monster Vault, Player’s Guide, Game Master’s Guide) will be 100% setting neutral - you can use them to run Midgard games, Forgotten Realms games, your homebrew word, etc.
Does that answer whatever the question is / was, or did I misunderstand?
I was saying making Midgard specific to ToV would drive off some people not that KP was doing that. Just that if it went that way it could/would. A hypothetical discussion.Not 100% sure what is being said here …
Tales of the Valiant is Kobold Press’s new RPG, Midgard is the official campaign setting.
The big core ToV books (Monster Vault, Player’s Guide, Game Master’s Guide) will be 100% setting neutral - you can use them to run Midgard games, Forgotten Realms games, your homebrew word, etc.
Does that answer whatever the question is / was, or did I misunderstand?
Fair enough!I suggested they shouldn't be so neutral, to differentiate yourself. They are with your concept of being neutral..