Sadras
Legend
Aye, @Flamestrike is back!
Aye, @Flamestrike is back!
honestly I’m disinterested in this thread after having to explain the same sentence 6 times, but I do appreciate the thoroughness of your response. Thanks for actually reading what I wrote and responding to it accordingly, though!
LOL sure, bud. Has nothing to do with you and others method of argument or repeatedly misreading simple statements.The reason why you are disinterested is simply because you are wrong. Let me explain using absurdo ad reductio:
.
The basis of your argument is that breaking LOS is enough to allow a rogue a change to hide. So all a rogue needs to do is to carry a blanket. He holds up the blanket and boom he can make his stealth check. This might work on toddlers and stupid dogs, but not on any creature with an Int score of 2 or better.
LOL sure, bud. Has nothing to do with you and others method of argument or repeatedly misreading simple statements.
Ill just go go ahead and block ya now, and greatly improve my online experience.
Interestingly toddlers (up to about 7 months of age) lack object permanence. This is why 'Peek-a-boo' works on them.
From their POV, you literally vanish from existence when you cant be observed, and then pop back in when they can observe you again.
Quantum theory currently asserts that this might actually be the real state of the universe, and all humans manage to do (at the age of 7 months) is fool ourselves into viewing the chaos of the universe as a consistent reality in order to interpret the chaos around us and mold it into reality.
As in; I know my car is parked downstairs because I remember parking it there (non-observational object permanence), and it's there when I go back to the car, but when I'm not observing it, it's not really 'downstairs' at all. It's only 'downstairs' because I altered reality to make it so.
A little like how an electron does not have both a position or momentum until you measure (observe) the bastard. The electron exists in a state of superposition, both everywhere in the universe, nowhere in the universe, going everywhere and going no-where, all at the same time. You cant meaningfully speak about what an electron is doing (or where it is) until that observation or measurement takes place.
Once you act on the electron (by measuring or observing it), only then does it become an 'electron with a position' or 'an electron with momentum'.
This isnt just semantics; it reflects the actual state of the unobserved electron. Everywhere and nowhere, doing everything and nothing, all at the same time. Until observed.
Sorry Einstein; God does indeed play dice.
LOL sure, bud.
Chill man.
Your argument is flawed. I know people arent pointing it out to you in the nicest way, but its flawed.
.
What part of “I’m disinterested in this thread” is complicated or confusing?