• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

What's with the Gnome Hate?


log in or register to remove this ad

Korgoth

First Post
I don't know what the problem is with the idea of little fey folk in colorful hats who live in the woods and can misdirect you with illusions. There's a problem with that?

I like the old legend just fine. Maybe it's not kung fu, anime or action movie enough for some people. I'll grant that the legendry of gnomes is a bit folksy and pedestrian. That's why I like it. The Otherworld should have its peasants, too.

Gnomes are fun. Though I don't need them to be player characters. They weren't in OD&D or Classic (they were monsters in those editions)... though you can just run a halfling and call it a "gnome". Works fine (unless you think they should all be able to cast illusions... but I don't see why a PC gnome should have to).
 







Mishihari Lord

First Post
--Raises hand--

Hater over here ...

I hate 'm because there's no substance to them. Humans, elves, dwarves, halflings, orcs, and so on all have volumes of literature including them. The D&D gnome has nothing. No mythology. No history. It's just flat. The 3" forest gnomes with the red hats? Those are cool, but they're not D&D gnomes.

The image of the D&D gnome has changed so frequently because they've never found one with wide appeal. I liked some of them, actually. The 1E gnome illusionist/trickster? Cool. Tinker gnomes? Cool. Generic 2E and 3E gnomes? Boring, boring, boring. And silly. I don't know which is worse.
 


Remove ads

Top