Arcane Power questions ahead of time

[ff6shadow]

A familiar is restored after a short rest. There is no penalty or cost involved.

In fact, a familiar can only be destroyed if you place it in active mode to use it's special abilities.

 

[Mirtek]

Just a quick offering, where I've compiled a great deal of Arcane Power spoilers I've found.

Wow, that's really great. Thank you very much. Just one question:

Improved Swordmage Warding
Prereq: Dex 13, swordmage, Swordmage Warding class feature
Benefit: While you are wearing cloth armor, leather armor or no armor, the bonus to AC from your Swordmage Warding increases by 1.

Does it increase at paragon/epic tier? I don't get it why the avenger should get a better base warding and a better improved warding feat than the swordmage

 

[abyssaldeath]

Wow, that's really great. Thank you very much. Just one question:

Does it increase at paragon/epic tier? I don't get it why the avenger should get a better base warding and a better improved warding feat than the swordmage

According to the link it increases to +2 at 21st.

Edit: Oops, there is a paragon feat called Greater Swordmage Warding that gives a +1 feat bonus and it increases to +2 at epic. I got it mixed up with the heroic feat.

 

[Artoomis]

Which I thought was dealt with by the statement "A character who has taken a class-specific multiclass feat counts as a member of that class for the purpose of meeting prerequisites for taking other feats and qualifying for paragon paths." The actual questions were regarding the Martial "power source", weren't they?

The exact same misguided argument could be made here. It looks like the same language.

Let's not go there, shall we?

Well,

 

[Artoomis]

Which I thought was dealt with by the statement "A character who has taken a class-specific multiclass feat counts as a member of that class for the purpose of meeting prerequisites for taking other feats and qualifying for paragon paths." The actual questions were regarding the Martial "power source", weren't they?

The exact same misguided argument could be made here. It looks like the same language.

Let's not go there, shall we?

Well, "misguided" may be strong lagiage but WotC has since made it clear that "any mnartiakl class" includes muticlassing, for

 

[Ryujin]

The exact same misguided argument could be made here. It looks like the same language.

Let's not go there, shall we?

Well,

Not trying to raise the shade of a dead thread. Some things just seem to be stated explicitly, to me.