Yesway Jose
First Post
Yes, I suppose that in order to comply with a request to get into the mind of a necromancer for a coherent philosophy, I mentally transported a necromancer into a simulacrum of real-life.It's really important to remember that regardless of what you think the shape of this world is, we know alot more about the shape of the D&D world and its probably (or almost certainly) not like this one. That difference makes a real difference in the D&D world. If you have a D&D world where people have outlooks that basically could belong to this world, then you could learn much I think by stopping a bit and going, "Well, what if all this D&D fluff was really true."
I get it that D&D fantasizes the bad and the ugly as much as the good, and that the depravity of necromancy is diluted. However, I never attempt to get into the heads of truly evil beings in any fantasy or sci-fi RPG or book or movie -- I think of them more as a narrative constructs, because as fictional personalities, well, I think they're mostly caricatures.
So if I would be asked to get into the mind of a necromancer entirely within the D&D fiction, then I don't know that I could produce a "coherent" philosophy because D&D fiction is not coherent.
I guess I don't understand myself all the recent interest in "evil is cool", but that's just me, and that's a whole other story.