Pathfinder 1E Could Pathfinder take D&D's place...


log in or register to remove this ad

I'm 97.13% sure I could simply say "Rubber baby buggy bumpers" and somehow someone would either take offense or say I'm doing it wrong.

It IS the internet after all.
 

This thread is actually a lot better if you replace all the "I don't mean to start anything, but..." posts with "rugger baby buggy bumpers".
 

I'm 97.13% sure I could simply say "Rubber baby buggy bumpers" and somehow someone would either take offense or say I'm doing it wrong.

It IS the internet after all.

[MENTION=73683]Dannager[/MENTION] does bring up some valid points--though your dodge is well played. That being said, because you brought up rubber baby buggy bumpers, the gloves are off! :p
 


Dominic Deegan isn't very good though.

I guess that would make it a good (INSERT GAME YOU DON'T LIKE) setting!

Oh, snap!
Heh, the question wasn't 'is someone good' it was 'is someone famous'.

The two do not always go together... look at Lady Gaga....

Actually, next to Lady Gaga... Dominic Deegan isn't that bad....

The Auld Grump, p-p-p-p-poker face....
 



"World of Dungeoncraft" sounds better, I think :D

There's nothing wrong with incorporating elements from famous computer games per se, so I don't see how that is an issue. My gripe with 4th edition is not that it incorporated elements from famous MMOs, but that it incorporated some of the worst elements (like calling things "controllers" and other similarly silly names :p)
 

Dannager does bring up some valid points


Valid points do not excuse bad behavior. If you cannot make your point without getting personal and rude, your point isn't nearly as valid as you think.

Dannager won't be continuing in this conversation due to his comportment. Others who continue in that line are apt to get a vacation from the site.
 

Remove ads

Top