I have no problems with variety. I even like the idea of mixing different styles as well - some full color, some inks, not a problem.
But, seriously? Any of the images I showed would even remotely be considered good? Those are just ugly.
I'm quite fond of the thought eater. I actually think it's a very solid illustration, it's weird, seems non-threatening at first blush, maybe even a little goofy, but the undertones of its dessicated appearance adds a note of subtle wrongness.
Let's do some side by side comparisons of different versions (some non-official, but still cool) of our psychic skeleton platypus:
[pics snipped]
Now, I totally agree that WOTC's last one is a completely different monster. But, even if you are going to stick with skeletal psychic playpus, there are MUCH better drawings to be how out there.
About absurdly long elven ears...blame Izubuchi Yutaka, who drawn elven(I mean, Deedlit's) ears wrong way
Yutaka Izubuchi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, I don't know his influence in non-Japanese fantasy art. But at least in Japan, Deedlit's ears are the reason why elven ears are depicted so ridiculously long.
(Somewhere I read he drwan her ears like antenna of robot.)
And just I want to show original character sheets of some characters from Record of Lodoss War.
http://www.enworld.org/forum/media-...-so-do-you-like-lodoss-war-2.html#post4567799
Ok Claudio, my opinion is wrong...This again?
This is "Anime D&D":
Ok Claudio, my opinion is wrong...
It's anime. The giant sword is anime. The hair cut is anime. It's barbarian D&D-esque version of Cloud from FF7. Same sword, same hair, same stance.
As the OP says. I hope this isn't 5E.