What I don't understand is - and I mean no disrespect to the OP here - how this person can be a "jerk", particularly an intentional jerk, and still expect to be a friend. Or be considered a friend. In what social dimension is this guy a friend?
See, this is a difference in perception, I guess. This does not translate for me. An intentionally abusive good guy. A good guy that intentionally abuses other people. It doesn't work.I dunno. I've got a friend who ... is definitely intentionally abusive.
...he's actually a good guy.
See, this is a difference in perception, I guess. This does not translate for me. An intentionally abusive good guy. A good guy that intentionally abuses other people. It doesn't work.
The bad guy with a heart of gold is a stereotype and story trope. And in the end of the story, he stops being a jerk. Also, curmudgeonly does not equal abuse. Rude, yes.The trope is a common one - variation on the curmudgeon with a heart of gold. The animated movie character Shrek is a good example - he's kind of a jerk to most folks, but somehow not a bad person in the end.
See, this is a difference in perception, I guess. This does not translate for me. An intentionally abusive good guy. A good guy that intentionally abuses other people. It doesn't work.
Ah. I didn't think of "rule" abuse. That does put a different spin on it."Abuse," in this case, is mostly in reference to abuse of the rules, abuse of the spirit of the game, and willful domination of the game. I'm not talking about belittling or physically abusing anyone.
So far so good at the last session. I'm taking a "wait & see" approach. Hoping for the best while preparing for the worst. I'm more optimistic about it working out than before.