Nope, because I - and I mean this quite entirely seriously - could give a fig less what the movement speeds of Halflings and Dwarves are in Next.
You are quite passionate about not giving a fig.
Nope, because I - and I mean this quite entirely seriously - could give a fig less what the movement speeds of Halflings and Dwarves are in Next.
It starts to feel like they're making a game for children (low IQ ones, at that).
You could say I vehemently don't care about the actual numbers.You are quite passionate about not giving a fig.
You could say I vehemently don't care about the actual numbers.
However, I very much enjoy pointing out bad arguments, especially when they're of the kind where D&D fantasy heroes get to be less capable than real-world heroes.
What? You provided the numbers yourself! You were using them for comparison, sure, but since 60' in 6 seconds is nowhere near human maximum for little people, I'm still not seeing the problem.Still trying to distract from the topic and dealing out strawmans I see.
Because no one here in this thread but you argued even remotely that the actual speed values given in 5E did or did not match the human capabilities in the real world.
It's not a strawman, it's pointing out that even at this speed, halflings are far from world class athletes.
I think two humans should be able to have different speeds, let alone a human and a halfling.
Oh! Well, I have no problem with humans being able to move 60' in 6 seconds, either. Nowhere near human maximum, doesn't strain my credulity at all.Which was never the point of the discussion for anyone but you.
The numbers I provided were to show a significant speed difference of athletes of "medium size" and athletes of "small size". Only because you didn't quote the second number didn't change that.
Oh! Well, I have no problem with humans being able to move 60' in 6 seconds, either. Nowhere near human maximum, doesn't strain my credulity at all.