D&D 5E (2014) No UA or Sage Advice for December 2017

MechaTarrasque · Dec 8, 2017

https://www.sageadvice.eu/2017/12/0...advice-articles-published-this-december-2017/

Morrus · Dec 8, 2017

I just manually saved that from an auto spambam for you. As a warning: a post which is just a URL has a higher than even chance of automatically getting your account banned by the system because it looks exactly like a spam post. I caught it this time because I happened to be looking just now.

Anyway, here's the post from WotC's Twitter account via a website via a forum thread:

"Sadly, the gnomes made a strong case for time off this month. There will be no Unearthed Arcana or Sage Advice articles published this December. We'll be back with full #DnD technomancer support in January!"

pukunui · Dec 8, 2017

And please note that they have clarified that "technomancer" was a joke. It does not refer to next year's UA content.

Yaarel · Dec 8, 2017

pukunui said:
And please note that they have clarified that "technomancer" was a joke. It does not refer to next year's UA content.

Aw.

SkidAce · Dec 9, 2017

pukunui said:
And please note that they have clarified that "technomancer" was a joke. It does not refer to next year's UA content.

Booooo. Hissssss.

abirdcall · Dec 9, 2017

Morrus said:
"Sadly, the gnomes made a strong case for time off this month. There will be no Unearthed Arcana or Sage Advice articles published this December. We'll be back with full #DnD technomancer support in January!"

It's time for the elves to work.

Hussar · Dec 9, 2017

And here I was getting all excited about getting a technomancer. Darn. shucks.

We must make this happen. We must have a technomancer.

What do we want? TECH!

When do we want it? RIGHT N... err.... after NEW YEARS!

Enevhar Aldarion · Dec 9, 2017

pukunui said:
And please note that they have clarified that "technomancer" was a joke. It does not refer to next year's UA content.

I knew as soon as I saw that tweet Friday afternoon that the first response from a lot of people would be an expectation of an actual technomancer class or sub-class. And considering the tweet came with a pic of a gnome with all sorts of gadgets and stuff, I wondered if they actually meant artificer, in case it was supposed to be a serious reference. And since the sage advice site does not include that, here is the actual tweet with pic:

https://twitter.com/Wizards_DnD/status/939216965188534272