No. You're the second worst. As you already know-
![]()
That guy is the worst.![]()
Hey, now! Sir McStabs-a-Lot, dual rapier wielding gnomish paladin of the order of the owl is my hero!

No. You're the second worst. As you already know-
![]()
That guy is the worst.![]()
I know. That's why you're the second worst.
Sir McStabs-a-Lot is the worst.
Oofta, his #1 fan, is the second-worst.
After that, we determine "worseness" by general proximity to Sir McStabs-a-Lot and/or Oofta, as the case may be. It's like Seven Degrees of Separation with Kevin Bacon, but .... much more pointless.
Does it make me a Lawful Jerk Paladin for typically enjoying playing my Paladins like they were being acted by Adam West?
Okay, that's a hypothesis which makes some predictions. If alignment is the cause of jerk paladin behavior because paladins lose their powers if they violate their alignment, then other classes which also lose their powers if they violate their alignment should also be prone to jerk behavior. But jerk clerics and jerk monks don't really seem to be a thing.But Paladin issues marinated in many editions of alignment garbage and the two are intertwined. Again, I point to the Lawful part of the thread title. A LG Fighter don't lose anything for not being lawful or good all the time. In previous editions, alignment mattered more to paladins than other classes.
Not at all. The only better way to play it is like the Tick.
"And so, may Evil beware and may Good dress warmly and eat lost of fresh vegetables."
It can work that way, but this isn't a magic formula for perfect paladins, even if the GM isn't out to get them. Sometimes it only leads to a frustrated or unsatisfied player.So, I think this is probably, in my experience, where the best paladins are forged. The ones the players really, really remember. Because being the only one who is unabashedly trying to be the good guy and having to muse through, "What is right here?" can often be very fun and engaging.