And it isn't a "let's just push this back to where I'm personally 'indifferent'" it's "Let's push this back to where I'm personally 'comfortable'"....
<snip>
Now I don't want anyone to have pineapple on there pizza, 'cuase if even one pizza has pineapple, they all have to pineapple, right?
This metaphor isn't reaching me. Okay, so someone - presumably, someone smug in the righteousness of their ideology, I'm familiar with *that* on both right and left - demands pineapple on all pizza. This is annoying, but not actually a problem, because if *you* order the pizza, you remain free to order pizza which doesn't have pineapple on it. If you're not ordering the pizza, then it's not your decision. If the Pineapple Purists use the authority of the government to *compel* pizzerias to always apply pineapple, *then* there's a problem. Do you have a version of the metaphor which includes the distinction between people expressing an opinion, and people actually constraining someone's behavior?
Real-world example: video game The Witcher. There are people who object to its in-game depiction of race. (You say there were no black people in Poland at the time, as if that were a well-established historical fact. There are some historians who disagree, see note below.) You can still buy The Witcher, you can still play it. Is someone harassing people who play The Witcher? One of Larry Correia's fans recently raised the question, on Correia's site, of how to harass Green Ronin at Origins; is anyone doing anything like that to CD Projekt? Is anyone treating them the way Team Milo treated Leslie Jones?
What part of "I mean they kind of always tried, but now there are enough of them, in positions of power in media and other arenas, that it's an untenable thing." to you didn't mean "Yes, there were always voices, now however..."
In answer to your question, as specifically as I can: the part in question, is the part where you also said "no one got upset". If you could establish an internally consistent position, perhaps we could have a more useful exchange of ideas?
Only to you, because the censorship board isn't likely to come for you. Yet. Just wait until your ideology isn't pure enough.
If you have any interest in persuading me - or if not me, perhaps others less stubborn than me - then stop mixing metaphor and fact; use both, if you like, but with clean separation between them. I am aware of *censorship*, as such, in the literal sense, in the USA, mainly in the form of legally mandated limitations of who can sell video games to minors, according to mandatory ratings. (Does the same apply in Canada?) I oppose those limits. I have a strong personal *opinion* about games such as Custer's Revenge (in which the goal is to have the white male avatar rape as many Native women as possible), but I don't want the government *censoring* Custer's Revenge. I want to persuade people not to buy Custer's Revenge; I don't want to use force, neither personally nor by a proxy with a badge and a gun. I haven't formed an opinion on The Witcher, but I want at least as much lassez-faire for The Witcher as for Custer's Revenge.
I wish they had MLK's idealogy. They don't. They don't want equality.
Wait, are you seriously accusing Samuel Delany, or Gene Roddenberry, or more recently John Scalzi and GRR Martin (major opponents of Sad/Rabid Puppies), or anyone at WotC or Paizo, of black supremacism?
Footnote: how white Medieval Europe was, and also Britain, across a range of terrain (Iberia to Poland) and centuries (13th != 15th). So on one hand, you've probably grown up with all-white imagery. Well, I grew up mostly seeing depictions of Moses as white, but knowing what I know now, I am skeptical of the imagery which formed my early conceptions, and I apply that skepticism retroactively and broadly. I mean, it's not an *accident* that so many people depict Moses as pale-skinned and sometimes even blue-eyed. (I don't know *for sure* whether his eyes or skin were brown; I'm just saying, I question the biases of those who chose to "fill in the blank" with white Moses, and same for The Witcher. Anyone who says, from their personal experience, "Germans are almost entirely white" - well, that's true, but if their perceptions of whether exceptions are rare, or merely uncommon, then they should perhaps consider the possibility that *the frequency of those exceptions changed in the 1930s and 1940s.* What they've seen personally is not how it's always been.
https://www.npr.org/sections/codesw...ying-glass-to-the-brown-faces-in-medieval-art
https://www.historians.org/publicat...lems-in-studying-the-role-of-blacks-in-europe