L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
First, is this enough to get people to purchase CBS- All Access?
It is an extra subscription, for which you must pay.
Wait... it may be that you need to pay if you want to avoid ads......
dingdingdingding! WE HAVE A WINNER! Thank you, Aeson, for raising this.
Star Trek, like Star Wars, peaked decades ago, and everything since has been a lesser, paler version. For Star Wars it was the original trilogy. In my opinion, while I have enjoyed much of what came later to varying degrees, everything (and I mean everything) lessened the "artistic legacy" of Star Wars.
Star Trek is less distinct, but for me the high point was Wrath of Khan. What else could it be? Everything after was a diminishing, with some ups and downs. I don't think later films and shows diminished the legacy as much as with Star Wars, but nothing really strengthened it. There were a couple later peaks (e.g. the Borg film), but mostly tapering off. Thinning.
I watched the first half season of Discovery and haven't felt pulled to finish it. I may or may not, but it was pretty forgettable. Star Trek has always been a combination of the strength and chemistry of the central characters and the conceptual stuff; the original series (and films) had the best characters. NextGen had some good characters, but not quite as good, but the conceptual stuff was mostly equal. Discovery seemed to be a step down in both.
The problem is trying to recreate the past. It is very, very hard to reboot or redo something in an equal or better way. Better to start something new. Why Star Trek? There's name recognition of course, and hopeful Trekkies. But how about a new franchise? Film/tv is so ridiculously derivative...there are so few fresh ideas. Occasonally we get a Snowpiercer or an Interstellar, but the reboots and rehashes...it is just creative recycling, with diminishing returns.
(All of which is my way of saying, I am very skeptical of any future Trek enterprises...ahem, pun intended).
IDK, man, DS9 has some of the best Trek there's ever been. Same with TNG. I don't think any of it diminished Trek. Not even Enterprise, in spite of how bad season 3 was. Of course, I don't absolutely vociferously despise the time war plotline like a lot of other nerds do, so...YMMV.
Call me one of those nerds then because I hated the Temporal Cold War storyline, when I'd been hoping to see the founding of the Federation.
DS9 definitely had some of the best modern storylines, once it picked up the writers from TNG. In particular I remember the episode in which Sisko lamented having to fool a Romulan diplomat with a fake recording of a Cardassian meeting and the diplomat being killed after he discovered the fake, and ending the episode by essentially saying that he'd do it all again.
Hey, even the OS had bad episodes, and bad movies.![]()
the entire Dominion War in DS9. The first season and end of the last season of enterprise were also excellent.
Voyager was really fun, but didn’t have any arcs or episodes that really gripped me like every other series had.
"What does God need with a starship?!?"
And, let us face it, "Star Trek: The MOtion Picture" was not an example of a thing... that actually had a plot.
Wrath of Khan and the Voyage Home, however, were probably the best movies, for me.
I kind of like them all, but the Dominion War had some great stuff in it. And the last season of Enterprise, when they handed things over to Manny Coto... that was what the entire series should have been, and it was good stuff.
I have been considering doing a rewatch of Voyager....