If an NPC is telling the truth, what's the Insight DC to know they're telling the truth?

Is it possible to be a veteran character but still be low level?

Technically yes, because "Soldier" is a background. :-)

I think, though, what you mean is that, in your interpretation, there is a whole bunch of knowledge about the game world that only an experienced ("veteran") character would know of. And that's fine; you apparently like playing that way.

But a lot of people think that:
1) Novice adventurers would be as likely to know facts about their real world monsters as we are likely to know about, say, the fact that a Playtpus has poison.
2) That it's just not interesting/fun/practical to pretend to be ignorant about game world knowledge, when there is so much other game world knowledge of which players actually are ignorant, and that if ignorance is important to you it's so easy to not use the stuff players already know about.

If you want to explain why your way is more enjoyable, because a lot of us are genuinely interested in understanding alternate forms of roleplaying, I (we?) would love to hear about it. But stubbornly stating (or implying) opinion as fact isn't really very compelling.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Technically yes, because "Soldier" is a background. :-)

I think, though, what you mean is that, in your interpretation, there is a whole bunch of knowledge about the game world that only an experienced ("veteran") character would know of. And that's fine; you apparently like playing that way.

But a lot of people think that:
1) Novice adventurers would be as likely to know facts about their real world monsters as we are likely to know about, say, the fact that a Playtpus has poison.
2) That it's just not interesting/fun/practical to pretend to be ignorant about game world knowledge, when there is so much other game world knowledge of which players actually are ignorant, and that if ignorance is important to you it's so easy to not use the stuff players already know about.

If you want to explain why your way is more enjoyable, because a lot of us are genuinely interested in understanding alternate forms of roleplaying, I (we?) would love to hear about it. But stubbornly stating (or implying) opinion as fact isn't really very compelling.

Funny.

No I don't think you are that interested So you do you and I'll do me.
 


No I don't think you are that interested So you do you and I'll do me.

That's ironic, because when I was writing my post about the oxytocin rush I was thinking, "You know, it's possible that the actor stance people get the same kind of rush from a really spot-on performance. I wonder if any of them will say something about that, or whether it's just going to be more of 'my version is the only real roleplaying' argument."
 


That's ironic, because when I was writing my post about the oxytocin rush I was thinking, "You know, it's possible that the actor stance people get the same kind of rush from a really spot-on performance. I wonder if any of them will say something about that, or whether it's just going to be more of 'my version is the only real roleplaying' argument."

I never said that the way I RP is any better or worse then anyone else's RP. I actually REALLY got the impression that that was the way you where coming off.

Because of the way you were being really dismissive of the example character pretending to act out his characters fear.
 



I never said that the way I RP is any better or worse then anyone else's RP. I actually REALLY got the impression that that was the way you where coming off.

Because of the way you were being really dismissive of the example character pretending to act out his characters fear.

It's possible I bear some emotional baggage from Saelorn stubbornly repeating that I wasn't really roleplaying (until he blocked me). So I tend to come out swinging on this issue.
 

Remove ads

Top