G
Guest 6801328
Guest
Well, it cuts both ways, really. There's nothing wrong with having simple options available, if they're at least viable (which has not always been the case), there's nothing wrong with more choice-rich options, if unless they're just plain broken (which often has been the case), and the presence of both in no way prevents those interested in only one from choosing that one.
Yet, /only/ the fighter got a simple option in 5e*. And, his choice-rich non-caster option makes, what? an additional 6 meaningful choices?
I don't understand what any of this has to do with not wanting other people to play the simple option.
The whole simple-fighter fetish seems like it's just part and parcel of the same 'Primacy of Magic' Essence-of-D&D. A simple fighter won't rival casters in versatility, so even if he gets some big numbers, doesn't threaten the Primacy of Magic. It's certainly very compatible with it, whatever motivations some of its proponents may harbor.
It's the Man trying to keep you down, Tony.