D&D 5E WotC's Jeremy Crawford on D&D Races Going Forward

On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty. @ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence...

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Twitter, Jeremy Crawford discussed the treatment of orcs, Vistani, drow and others in D&D, and how WotC plans to treat the idea of 'race' in D&D going forward. In recent products (Eberron and Wildemount), the mandatory evil alignment was dropped from orcs, as was the Intelligence penalty.


636252771691385727.jpg


@ThinkingDM Look at the treatment orcs received in Eberron and Exandria. Dropped the Intelligence debuff and the evil alignment, with a more acceptable narrative. It's a start, but there's a fair argument for gutting the entire race system.

The orcs of Eberron and Wildemount reflect where our hearts are and indicate where we’re heading.


@vorpaldicepress I hate to be "that guy", but what about Drow, Vistani, and the other troublesome races and cultures in Forgotten Realms (like the Gur, another Roma-inspired race)? Things don't change over night, but are these on the radar?

The drow, Vistani, and many other folk in the game are on our radar. The same spirit that motivated our portrayal of orcs in Eberron is animating our work on all these peoples.


@MileyMan1066 Good. These problems need to be addressed. The variant features UA could have a sequel that includes notes that could rectify some of the problems and help move 5e in a better direction.

Addressing these issues is vital to us. Eberron and Wildemount are the first of multiple books that will face these issues head on and will do so from multiple angles.


@mbriddell I'm happy to hear that you are taking a serious look at this. Do you feel that you can achieve this within the context of Forgotten Realms, given how establised that world's lore is, or would you need to establish a new setting to do this?

Thankfully, the core setting of D&D is the multiverse, with its multitude of worlds. We can tell so many different stories, with different perspectives, in each world. And when we return to a world like FR, stories can evolve. In short, even the older worlds can improve.


@SlyFlourish I could see gnolls being treated differently in other worlds, particularly when they’re a playable race. The idea that they’re spawned hyenas who fed on demon-touched rotten meat feels like they’re in a different class than drow, orcs, goblins and the like. Same with minotaurs.

Internally, we feel that the gnolls in the MM are mistyped. Given their story, they should be fiends, not humanoids. In contrast, the gnolls of Eberron are humanoids, a people with moral and cultural expansiveness.


@MikeyMan1066 I agree. Any creature with the Humanoid type should have the full capacity to be any alignmnet, i.e., they should have free will and souls. Gnolls... the way they are described, do not. Having them be minor demons would clear a lot of this up.

You just described our team's perspective exactly.


As a side-note, the term 'race' is starting to fall out of favor in tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder has "ancestry", and other games use terms like "heritage"); while he doesn't comment on that specifically, he doesn't use the word 'race' and instead refers to 'folks' and 'peoples'.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
SJW: not all orcs are evil!

also SJW: all cops are evil!
That’s not at all what ACAB means. It’s not meant to express that every individual cop is a bad person. Rather, it is a statement about the police as an institution, that it is corrupt and structured in such a way to protect the “bad cops” and discourage the “good cops” from actually doing anything about it. The message is that, good or bad, all cops are willing participants in a bad system.

This is not the case with always-evil orcs. The evil of always-evil orcs comes from their nature, rather than corrupt institutions. Unlike cops, every last always-evil orc is evil. If orcs tended towards evil not because of their essential nature, but because of institutional issues in their society, that would be a very different story. Actually I think that would be a pretty cool setting conceit.
 
Last edited:

Aldarc

Legend
It just seems like an artificial delineation to me. We know that no human is inherently evil because of their culture or society because we are human. We can't know what an orc or a fiend really thinks because they aren't real.
But as orcs are fictional, the fiction around them can change to something that real life humans find as less problematic to racial sensitivity and as creators of fictive worlds, we can say a lot about what an orc or fiend thinks or feels because they aren't real. However, there are people who are telling you that they are uncomfortable with how orcs are presented in the game of D&D and would like it to change from how it is.

I’m a self described “Pinko-commie-liberal scum”, and I will still play a game of Monopoly without fear of somehow having debased myself ethically, (well beyond Monopoly being boring).
Monopoly was invented by an anti-capitalist woman as a critique of capitalism.

I think a lot of people don’t realize just how popular anything Viking related is with neo-Nazis and other white supremacist groups. Especially in America, most Viking reenactment and similar hobbyist groups have at least some white supremacist presence.
This is actually one reason why I have found a lot of the Viking RPGs of late kinda off-putting. I noticed that some were attracting a lot of bad apples, to put it lightly. It has almost become a red flag in and of itself, and I never thought that it would or should be, but here we are.
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
I think the humor of Community is sharp enough that Shirley and Pierce can be wrong and right at the same time. What you say about them is true, but their identification of this as a probable reaction to Chang is clearly correct, given the conversation about it we're having now. Whether we're supposed to laugh at them for their simplicity, laugh at Chang for his insensitivity, or both, is up to us. Everybody is entertained, everybody who gives it a second thought is a little bit uncomfortable, it's just good satire at work.

(Nice hat, by the way.)
Community - like many comedies- uses characters who are bundles of improbabilities.

A more realistic version of Pierce would probably still sling the same Al Jolson quip. Modern bigots often aren’t capable of making the distinction between minstrelry and slathering one’s self with dark pigments.

A more realistic version of Shirley, OTOH, would be aware of the images and sounds of minstrelry. It’s damn near impossible to grow up black in the USA without seeing depictions of it. And Drow makeup just doesn’t look the part.
 
Last edited:

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Monopoly was invented by an anti-capitalist woman as a critique of capitalism.
I find it very amusing that people actually play monopoly for fun, even as they complain about what an awful experience it is to play. That’s literally the point, it’s not supposed to be fun, it’s supposed to be satire.

This is actually one reason why I have found a lot of the Viking RPGs of late kinda off-putting. I noticed that some were attracting a lot of bad apples, to put it lightly. It has almost become a red flag in and of itself, and I never thought that it would or should be, but here we are.
Yeah, it sucks. One thing that can help is to intentionally represent a more accurately diverse Viking society in such media, as the white supremacist types tend to find that off-putting.
 

Orcslayer78

Explorer
That’s not at all what ACAB means. It’s not meant to express that every individual cop is a bad person. Rather, it is a statement about the police as an institution, that it is corrupt and structured in such a way to protect the “bad cops” and discourage the “good cops” from actually doing anything about it. The message is that, good or bad, all cops are willing participants in a bad system.

This is not the case with always-evil orcs. The evil of always-evil orcs comes from their nature, rather than corrupt institutions. Unlike cops, every last always-evil orc is evil. If orcs tended towards evil not because of their essential nature, but because of institutional issues in their society, that would be a very different story. Actually I think that would be a pretty cool setting conceit.

Which is already what happens to Drow, they live in an evil society which worship evil and they're imprinted to evil since their birth, but some Drow like Drizz't and other adventurers show them they're not evil to the core but only mislead.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Which is already what happens to Drow, they live in an evil society which worship evil and they're imprinted to evil since their birth, but some Drow like Drizz't and other adventurers show them they're not evil to the core but only mislead.
And as a result they are frequently pointed to as an example of a D&D race that is typically evil without being essentially evil. It’s precisely the kind of setup I think most folks on the “not all orcs are evil” side of the fence would like to see more of.

I mean, the depiction of drow has other problems of course, but in that sense at least, they’re better than orcs.
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
The swastika is quite important to Hinduism and Buddhism and Jainism. Symbolizing spirituality and divinity. Symbolizing good luck and auspiciousness. Still is used in Asia for that.
Goddamn shame that goddamn little shites misappropriated it.
Don’t forget Native Americans. The 45th Infantry Division of the US National Guard had a swastika as their emblem until they were deployed to Europe- they switched to the thunderbird. Both emblems were chosen because a large percentage of the soldiers were Native Americans from Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and especially Oklahoma.
 

That’s not at all what ACAB means. It’s not meant to express that every individual cop is a bad person. Rather, it is a statement about the police as an institution, that it is corrupt and structured in such a way to protect the “bad cops” and discourage the “good cops” from actually doing anything about it. The message is that, good or bad, all cops are willing participants in a bad system.
You refrained from spelling out what "ACAB" literally stands for. I recognize that this whole paragraph of explanation is difficult to fit on a signboard, but I also suspect a part of you recognizes that "All Cops Are Bastards" might well be the worst possible way to condense it. Orcslayer78 was just throwing rocks at a strawman, and could easily be dismissed as such, but when you chimed in to remind us that, yes, this is a real slogan out there, you actually lent his tantrum some legitimacy it did not need.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
You refrained from spelling out what "ACAB" literally stands for. I recognize that this whole paragraph of explanation is difficult to fit on a signboard, but I also suspect a part of you recognizes that "All Cops Are Bastards" might well be the worst possible way to condense it. Orcslayer78 was just throwing rocks at a strawman, and could easily be dismissed as such, but when you chimed in to remind us that, yes, this is a real slogan out there, you actually lent his tantrum some legitimacy it did not need.
🤷‍♀️ I didn’t invent the slogan, but dismissing the idea behind it because one doesn’t like the wording is nonsense on the level of dismissing black lives matter on the basis of it not being called “all lives matter.”
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top