FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
I agree with most of what you are saying - and 100% believe that clear non jargon filled language is much better for communication.
But - I think a person filling a position like this needs to understand the jargon involved, regardless. WoTC is, in theory, hiring someone to make an impact on their corporate culture (for the better). That's a hugely uphill battle. For someone to hope to change it, they need to understand it - and that means understanding the jargon involved; while also maybe using less (or none) of it themselves to further clear communication.
I don’t think anyone really understands that level of jargon. Not the people hiring for the job and not the person applying. What happens is smart candidates tie their experiences and expertise to a potential interpretation of that jargon and whoever sounds good to the hiring manager (with solid experience and education) then getS the job.
kind of like how Agile development and associates jargon became a big thing for companies where the people hiring for that position could use the jargon but were clueless on how it really worked.