D&D 5E Psionics in Tasha

There were two versions, psionic mind and aberrant mind. Only the latter had the Chtulhu vibe. And yeah, I agree that they should definitely drop that. Thematically the sorcerer version should just be pure 'psionic mind,' without Lovecraftian stuff. Leave that to the warlocks.

Based on what WotC said, and correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't it that hey were going to double-down on the Lovecraftian stuff, just not literally force you to be a blob-man?

(PS I made a comment re: spell slots etc. above - In short I somewhat agree)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Based on what WotC said, and correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't it that hey were going to double-down on the Lovecraftian stuff, just not literally force you to be a blob-man?
Frankly, I don't know. All the threads about what's in Tasha's and which bits are confirmed and which are just rumours is rather confusing. It the psionics gets married with the Cthulhu stuff on fundamental level, then I certainly see that a pretty valid issue to complain about. But will they do that? I really hope that there is at least is some builds that let you avoid that. Like sure, It is one way to interpret this stuff, but it shouldn't be the default.

tashapsi2-jpg.126567

The person in the Mind Sliver art doesn't look like some cthulhuesque mutant. But perhaps that is the psychic monk...
 

The person in the Mind Sliver art doesn't look like some cthulhuesque mutant. But perhaps that is the psychic monk...

Indeed, if Mind Sliver is like it is in the UAs, it'll be available to most of the arcane classes and probably some others.

Last I read, they had much more positive feedback on the theme of the Aberrant Soul than the Psionic Soul, but players really didn't want to be forced to have "mutant" PCs (even though they liked the ability to slip through cracks etc). So I'll be pretty surprised if Far Realm isn't the major theme here rather than Psionics. That said if we get a contents page for Tasha's and it says "Psionic Soul" I will revise my expectations.
 

So why does magic work in Hell? Why does Mephistophleses make deals with wizards to have them perform arcane research in the 8th layer? After all, they are powerless and can't do magic, or understand whatever force is being used in the Nine Hells, since it can't be magic, because Mystra can't effect the Nine Hells, and Mystra according to you, is the source of all magical energy.

In fact, I watched a video on Spelljammer a few months ago. They specifically said that while traveling the Phlogiston, Divine magic doesn't work beyond 2nd level I think they mentioned. But Arcane magic does, because you could accidentally explode everything with a fire spell. How is this possible? We are far outside of the Realms of the Gods, to the point where their clerics are rendered powerless, so Mystra can't be providing Divine Magic.

Are there super-secret Magic Gods just floating between the worlds, in the place where Gods don't exist, providing Arcane magic to travelers, but not Divine?


Again, it makes far more sense that the Gods like Mystra simply provide a framework and filter to make using magic easier, but that Magic itself is more like air. In and around everything, flowing in and out of the environment. This also would explain how some creatures are innately magical, higher concentrations of magical energy in their bodies. Not blessings of the Goddess of Magic, which is what would have to happen, under your framework.
Maybe, just maybe, D&D isn't entirely coherent.
 





What's wrong this this character? Why isn't it a psion?

Human 9th Level Psionic Soul Sorcerer
Cantrips: Friends, Mage Hand, Message, Mind Sliver, Minor Illusion
1st Level: Charm Person, Id Insinuation
2nd Level: Detect Thoughts, Hold Person, Levitate
3rd Level: Fear, Psionnic Blast
4th Level: Confusion, Ego Whip
5th Level: Dominate Person

Metamagic: Subtle Spell, Heightened Spell
And this is a pizza:
sffdsdf.jpg
 

Yet no one can define what that actually means. And if it is about the rules, you haven't seem them yet.
First, several people have defined it. We may have defined it differently, but we have defined what it means to us. Second, there are many things in real life that we can't define exactly, but know when we see it.

Maybe we will be pleasantly surprised and these spells are NOT psionics at all and there will be real psionic rules in the book. However, if these spells are it, then they are not psionics. These spells have verbal components which makes them not psionics.
 

Remove ads

Top