D&D 5E What exactly is an "object" for purposes of the Reduce spell?


log in or register to remove this ad



toucanbuzz

No rule is inviolate
I usually take "an object" to mean something the party could conceivably carry otherwise. A 100' statue carved from a monolith is a no-go.
It's why I included the intro about objects being something a normal person could normally destroy given the right tool. If we apply that to "objects" for D&D purposes, we nix things like 100' tall stone statues, the 40 ton block of stone guarding the dwarven fortress, castle gates, and so on, from the equation.
 

NotAYakk

Legend
If it is clearly an object, say yes.

If it isn't clear if it is an object, call for an appropriate attribute check.

If it is clear it isn't an object, say no.
 

Lanefan

Victoria Rules
It's why I included the intro about objects being something a normal person could normally destroy given the right tool.
Over how long?

I mean, give me an axe, a whetstone, and about a week and I could take down that big wooden gate in the photo. Does that count?
 


toucanbuzz

No rule is inviolate
Over how long?

I mean, give me an axe, a whetstone, and about a week and I could take down that big wooden gate in the photo. Does that count?
That's the reason I need to set some guidelines. I have no problem with the gate being an object. I do have a problem with zero limitation on size for the 2nd level spell to work.
 

Hriston

Dungeon Master of Middle-earth
It's pretty open ended what classifies as an object. Castle walls and colossal statues are given as examples. The fact that it's defined as a discrete item gives you some basis for dividing something like a gate into several discrete objects depending on how it's constructed. I'd start by finding a picture of a gate like the one I imagine and make that the basis for my description and any ruling about what parts it's comprised of.
 


Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top