TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad




It was just one or two pages before this one… as you said, being dismissive withou reading the entire thing is not cool
LOL he was being dismissive OF A POST OF MINE HE WAS REPLYING TO WITH A QUOTE. My comment had nothing to do with people needing to read all 380 posts in a thread, in addition to the two other threads which also had several hundred posts, before replying to anything in the thread.

That's why I asked him if it was in this thread. I was not dismissive of what he said, I was simply asking him about it.
 

Ok, let's talk about it!

We could talk about the kickstarter he hasn't fulfilled for 5 years and which he made some inexplicable comments about?
We could talk about the copyright and trademark issues surrounding this topic?
People who take money from kickstarters and don't deliver strike me as grifters. I understand it can be complicated, but there have been tons of osr (and 5e, and Indie) kickstarters that have opened and fulfilled during a pandemic. Shipping internationally. With open communication throughout.
Further, it's really sleazy to take a trademark out from under someone else and then license it back to them. Maybe he thinks it's his family's heritage but it's really not.

So, "politics" aside, Ernie Gygax does not seem like a very nice person! He says he loves to laugh. Is he laughing at his backers?

We could talk about in general the Public Relations issues surrounding Indie companies and this companies general PR problems without getting into the political specifics of them?
Nu-TSR can be an object lesson of everything not to do, I guess.
We could talk about what all the prior original TSR members left are all doing these days, gaming-wise?
They have youtube channels with tens to hundreds of followers

We could talk about all the things we'd want to see, as consumers, coming from a new TSR?
We could talk about who we wished had started a new TSR other than these guys?
dnd is more popular than it ever was and the osr is producing very creative, high quality products. We don't need a new tsr, run by anyone. It's just a brand, one with not much value
 

LOL he was being dismissive OF A POST OF MINE HE WAS REPLYING TO WITH A QUOTE. My comment had nothing to do with people needing to read all 380 posts in a thread, in addition to the two other threads which also had several hundred posts, before replying to anything in the thread.

That's why I asked him if it was in this thread. I was not dismissive of what he said, I was simply asking him about it.
But before that, you were saying that there was nothing more to be gainned by talking about it, aka being dismissive, even though you did not read the thread. Jist because YOU don’t think you have nothing more to gain from it, it doesn’t mean other people agree.
 

Do you really think it wise to play the "You disagree, so you didn't read my post" card in this thread? An approach of dubious rhetorical strength, and that often gets red text on its own, even in a non-contentious thread?

Because if that's your approach to anyone in this discussion, you will be leaving it shortly.
Umbran, what I said could not be fairly dismissed as "well that's all legal stuff which we have no information about". If you think it was, show me which item on that list other that the copyright and trademark can only be discussed in terms of legal aspects?

Here is the list again, with my notations at the end. One is legal, one is arguably legal and arguably not (I meant just talk about the game of Star Frontiers but I can see how you might think I was talking about legal aspects of it) and the rest are not legal. But you hand-waived the entire list with that response. So if you read the list, I am wondering why you thought dismissing it as all legal topics was appropriate?

We could talk about the kickstarter he hasn't fulfilled for 5 years and which he made some inexplicable comments about? - NOT LEGAL
We could talk about the copyright and trademark issues surrounding this topic? - LEGAL
We could talk about Star Frontiers? -NOT ALL LEGAL, THOUGH SOME ASPECTS COULD BE LEGAL
We could talk about in general the Public Relations issues surrounding Indie companies and this companies general PR problems without getting into the political specifics of them? - NOT LEGAL
We could talk about the Giantlands game they mention as their first product? - NOT LEGAL
We could talk about how all this relates to the prior TSR company with the Top Secret game? -NOT LEGAL
We could talk about how all this relates to the prior Gygax magazine? -NOT LEGAL
We could talk about what all the prior original TSR members left are all doing these days, gaming-wise? -NOT LEGAL
We could talk about all the things we'd want to see, as consumers, coming from a new TSR? -NOT LEGAL
We could talk about who we wished had started a new TSR other than these guys? -NOT LEGAL
 

But before that, you were saying that there was nothing more to be gainned by talking about it, aka being dismissive, even though you did not read the thread. Jist because YOU don’t think you have nothing more to gain from it, it doesn’t mean other people agree.
No I was asking if anything more was to be gained from it. I have read the thread I just appear to have missed a single post in the thread. And I didn't even say I have nothing more to gain from it either. I also said those are all topics worth discussing but, as it had been stated there was no way to talk about it without those things being the focused, I listed other aspects of the topic which I also thought were worth discussing.
 

I don't know if this is a translation issue (bonjour!) but... no?

Bigots aren't just going "hey don't buy this person's products because of their politics!". If it was only that. Oh no. There were more than one violent attacks against Muslims in Canada *this month alone". Some people died. Trans people get harassed, denied services, physically attacked...

So while I appreciate you trying to calm tempers and bring some perspective, when you say "doing the exact same thing as the bigots" you are doing the opposite, because your statement is not true, at all. This is a false equivalence.
Yes, and no.
There are muslims who attack poeple in the street, and do kill non muslims. Are all muslims hateful? Of course not.
You just fell into the same pit trap that many do. You associate individuals with their society/affiliations and you should not do that. Ever.
Modern western societies are more opened that they were a 100 years ago and more close minded today than they will be a hundred years from now. Our societies are opening up. Growing more tolerant. But still, there are those that would like a 180 degree turn around and go back to bigotry and mysoginy and other stupidities. I prefer to judge a person by his/her/their actions. Just like I prefer to judge a society by its law and its attemps to better its people. Western civilisations are on the right way. Do not mistakes the will of some for the way the society truly is. No I am not blind nor am I oblivious. I could give examples of societies that are expressively attacking human rights and are actually killing people because they are fighting to open up their society! But this would be to heavily fall into politics and would also be a pitfall in which we would not judge the people but only the minority in charge... There is a lot of grey in our world. And some of the grey is lightening up, some of the the grey is darkening. We must fight, but we must not oppress, lest we get oppressed in return.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top