TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

You make bigots uncomfortable by making it difficult to be a bigot at all. Sunlight is one method to do that, more direct action is another option such as boycotting, but it doesn't matter how many bigots you take down in public unless their rhetoric is also destroyed or at least debased to a point where everyone recognizes it for what it is and comes to hate it.
Agreed.
When bigots feel like they can't be bigoted in front of their own family you have succeeded in large part.
Yep.
The idea that people will be desensitized to recognizing evil is a bit of a cop out. It's a call to fear for the future that if we are too strong in our repudiation of evil we will somehow make evil acceptable. A ridiculous claim, and an argument to ridiculousness based on the idea that somehow every person in the world must be warned of every other person in the world who is not a good person. That is not the case.
It's a reality. And no it is not a call to fear. As well I made no such claim.
With this thread, it is very difficult to remember how all the topics started. This one started because I did not know the name of some person pointed out to be bad (a quick Google told me they were convicted of burning multiple churches. Sounds like there is more to it as well.) And it was then explained that we should all know who this person was, otherwise they might get an ENnie award.

In short it was implied that I should know who that person was. And that is, as you point out, absolutely ridiculous. So seems like we are agreed.
Even the people who are ridiculously bigoted today largely try to avoid being identified as bigots. They use coded language and things of that nature in an attempt to go under the radar. This means we have largely succeeded at making their level of bigotry, specifically violent bigotry, untenable in greater society.

This will continue to be achieved by pointing out problems, getting other people to recognize them, and continuing to ostracize bigots from society until they self reform.
Yes it will. By doing so in a targeted manner. Or are you proposing to (once again) make a big list of all the bigots and make sure everyone is aware of them? Because you said above that such an idea is "ridiculousness". So what do you mean?
 

Weird how all the targeted sunlight folks have been shining over in the threads on Twitter hasn’t gotten their social media dude to even unfollow him, much less say “hey sorry we didn’t know about this guy prior to now - problem rectified and also to reiterate, racism has no place in our big happy gaming tent!”

Nobody is expecting everyone to know everything about every bad person all at once. But it’s also not like this just happened yesterday. V was sent to prison in 94 and has been out since 2009. Movies and documentaries have been made about him, what happened and the scene he was a part of.
So if something happened 15+ years ago then everyone should be aware of it? Or only if some documentary that was seen by 1 percent of the population?

I repeat, it's a good thing that not everyone knows about him. But it's also a good thing that his evils have been documented and are easy to find so that when someone does interact with them, or choses to do business with them, such can easily be discovered. But to quote @Steampunkette, to expect everyone to be aware is "ridiculousness".
 


This one started because I did not know the name of some person pointed out to be bad (a quick Google told me they were convicted of burning multiple churches. Sounds like there is more to it as well.) And it was then explained that we should all know who this person was, otherwise they might get an ENnie award.

In short it was implied that I should know who that person was. And that is, as you point out, absolutely ridiculous. So seems like we are agreed.
Man, that was indeed the quickest Google search on earth if you somehow only got the church arsons out of your research and not the cold blooded murder of his former bandmate and his open Nazi leanings, which I would argue he’s a bit more famous for than the church burnings. Those just came first chronologically.

But your dismissive tone (“otherwise they might get an ENnie”) is noted. I won’t be bothering to engage again. I hope your Google skills improve.
 



It's called "consequences."

People like to call it "cancel" because then they can say "other people cancelled me," not "I'm suffering the consequences of my actions."
Right here, this is the heart of what this is all about. Thank you for saying it. If I ever get to meet you face to face, I'm going to buy you a sandwich. :D Or Ice Cream. Or, I suppose, an ice cream sandwich.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

Top