TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad

I am just completely amazed at how quickly they've managed to burn literately every bridge possible.

This one's gonna go down in the history books in terms of 'bad ideas'. Probably not as bad as "That time White Wolf got banned from an entire country so hard they were shut down", but "Company destroys literately any goodwill and alienates entire RPG buying audience in 3 days" is still the bad sort of impressive.
What about "That time White Wolf threatened to sue every LARP group that didn't pay them for a license to run a LARP set in WoD."

What about "That time that Games Workshop decided to trademark 'Space Marine' and got the entire sci-fi community coming down on them like a ton of bricks?"

Those are the only Really Bad Ideas I can think of on the same scale in my time in the gaming community.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

"I just want to play games, leave your politics at the door" is the same policy as "don't ask, don't tell"
It's telling queer people you will only accept them if they're in the closet
That them just existing is political

You can't say that anyone is welcome at their table and then say people have to leave politics at the door
You're not really welcome if you have to lie about who you are

But Ernie must be 60 now
I don't expect someone as old as my father to be woke
(But that's probably why I'm still closeted with him)
 

Are you giving me Moderator permission to speak my mind freely without getting banned or "infractioned"?

Mod Note:
No.


Honest question. Because if I was to be "clear on what I mean, exactly", I'm pretty sure I'd get some label slapped on me and then complaints and then infraction points or banned. So...yeah.

Mod Note:
So... this is basically an admission that what you really intend is not acceptable on these boards which is exactly what I expected.

Next time, please resist the urge. If you cannot take constructive part, don't take part at all. More sly attempts to sneak one under the radar will get you punted form the thread.
 

Mod Note:
No.



Mod Note:
So... this is basically an admission that what you really intend is not acceptable on these boards which is exactly what I expected.

Next time, please resist the urge. If you cannot take constructive part, don't take part at all. More sly attempts to sneak one under the radar will get you punted form the thread.
All I see is red text, which means whoever you're quoting has me on ignore. Judging by your red text, I'm betting it's not a huge loss for me
 

Agreed.

Yep.

It's a reality. And no it is not a call to fear. As well I made no such claim.
With this thread, it is very difficult to remember how all the topics started. This one started because I did not know the name of some person pointed out to be bad (a quick Google told me they were convicted of burning multiple churches. Sounds like there is more to it as well.) And it was then explained that we should all know who this person was, otherwise they might get an ENnie award.

In short it was implied that I should know who that person was. And that is, as you point out, absolutely ridiculous. So seems like we are agreed.

Yes it will. By doing so in a targeted manner. Or are you proposing to (once again) make a big list of all the bigots and make sure everyone is aware of them? Because you said above that such an idea is "ridiculousness". So what do you mean?
You are the only person who has suggested that everyone needs to have a big list of bigots that everyone else must learn.

This is a Strawman argument, and not a very good one, either. Stop it.

Back on topic:

63e961d2cc6a0b3163f4112db84ec4e4102beb2f.jpg
 


For what it's worth, a hesitancy to share bigoted opinions on this message board is solid evidence that the ostracization of bigots is successful in making this a safer place for people like me

Not really. That US NGO (Southern Poverty Law etc) that keeps track of online hate speech noted a while ago it pushes it underground.

But it gets more extreme and violent. Not so much this board in particular more the whole cancel idea.

It does create a bubble but seems to be backfiring.

Having it out in the open doesn't scare me. The line wolf thing does as that's what happened here couple of years back.
 

I don't know, "consequences" sounds ominous. Maybe because in my country "consequences" over speech typically involve persecution, imprisonment, exile, and death.
How about a “mismatch of values?” This company’s values don’t match mine and therefore I don’t care to purchase any of their products.

I find threads like this to be very helpful - in deciding who to spend my hard earned dollars on.
 

All I see is red text, which means whoever you're quoting has me on ignore. Judging by your red text, I'm betting it's not a huge loss for me

Could you please:
1) not comment on moderation, as that's not allowed under the rules, and
2) not talk about ignores in public, because it is taking potshots at people who cannot represent themselves.

Thanks.
 

But Ernie must be 60 now
I don't expect someone as old as my father to be woke
(But that's probably why I'm still closeted with him)
I don't know if that's necessarily a fair statement. I mean, I get how for many people, moral relativity and being "a product of the time" is a real thing. I just don't think it's a real thing that we should automatically assume someone isn't progressive based on age.

the older I get, the more progressive I get, and I'm getting close to 50. There are plenty of progressive older people. Ernie's also been around the gaming community his whole life (more progressive people than the general public I imagine) and hasn't been living under a rock. These comments are his choice, and he's choosing to hang out with toxic people and making more and more exclusionary statements as time passes. I'm not saying he has to be a tree hugging liberal, but he's going down an unfortunate path.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top