TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad

Tim Kask did an interview about five years ago regarding the feedback they got from the cover of Eldritch wizardry and the succubus art. He said it was in the middle of the sexual revolution, and simply silly people were looking to DnD for sex pics when playboy and penthouse were taking off lol.

So the 70s? Sexual revolution? Yeah, in hindsight it seems impossible to not have sexist issues viewed through a modern lens.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I find it odd that much of anything in the past is free of some combination of racism, sexism, and bigotry... or that many other people who've thought about it are surprised to learn it was. I assume the future will look back on us with shaking heads too.
In my head, I viewed Gary Gygax as one the better end of the ethical spectrum in his era.

But if his son is trafficking with racist supremacists? Vicious homophobes? Enforced gender?

Something foul is in someones ideology.
 

That's question I have too: what rpg-related things did he make/create/participate in the past 30 years?

There was the short-lived Gygax mag, but before that?
I believe he had something to do with Gaxmoor and possibly another project or two.

EDIT: I'm not sure of the policy here with links. But if you look for the Lost City of Gaxmoor it's on Amazon and has some background on the product and Ernie's part.
 

Aged horribly is the sort of thing you say about a guy from the 30s or something. Gygax was saying that stuff about women's brains on a dang web forum. His avatar was his Futurama appearance. Let's not even accidentally suggest that stuff is from the dim mists of history, it was 16 years ago. The two things that aged horribly were Gygax's views and Gygax.

He was born close to the 1930's and raised by people in that era.
Yeah his comments have aged badly but it's understandable why he had those opinions considering when and where he was raised.
 

Why wait. You have the essence of those times before you. Ask me, or would you rather do dead scrolls research and wait until I, too, pass? Btw: Who is "us"? Are you a corporation or institution?
In this context I mean fans of D&D like me.

Rob, you know the family. How is it possible that Ernie Gygax can associate with extremist hate groups, including Varg Vikernes?

Ernie Gygax himself revealed his own hate against "wrong" genders.

Whats going on here?
 


In my head, I viewed Gary Gygax as one the better end of the ethical spectrum in his era.

But if his son is trafficking with racist supremacists? Vicious homophobes? Enforced gender?

Something foul is in someones ideology.

The person saying the heinous things?
 

I cannot see how something as involved and complex as the wandering harlots table could be any sort of accident: itsnot just the obvious misogyny, it's the thought and effort that went into actively constructing an elaborate misogynistic joke generation tool.
I hate to be "that gal" but it's not really that complex a table. There was an encounter table for urban environments, "harlot" was one of the many entries, then a sub-table of different "types" of harlots. Because, I'm guessing, Gary's party often employed them (I hope that's all they did and they didn't pull a FATAL) and he assumed everyone else would as well.
 

Tim Kask did an interview about five years ago regarding the feedback they got from the cover of Eldritch wizardry and the succubus art. He said it was in the middle of the sexual revolution, and simply silly people were looking to DnD for sex pics when playboy and penthouse were taking off lol.

So the 70s? Sexual revolution? Yeah, in hindsight it seems impossible to not have sexist issues viewed through a modern lens.
Hiring teenage boys as artists probably contributed a lot.

So, funny story, I got a number of 1E books secondhand a while back, and they make good reading. I looked at the DMG cover and thought "Cool action, a giant Firnd fighting a party of adventurers! What's that city in the back page?!?@?"

At some point, my wife (who does play and DM as well, but started with 4E) took a look at the cover and pointed out a detail that never consciously occurred to me: her discomfort with the way the warrior woman is dressed. It was total background noise yo me, but it was a major turn-off to her. We all have blindspots and flaws, and can grow if we get outside our own heads.
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top