TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

I'm guessing many people alive today have distorted or buried memories on many of the issues. I'm pretty sure based on voting records how much of the white southern US felt about segregation and things even worse, but I'm wondering what percent of people today would lump themselves or their parents or grandparents among the offenders. I know first hand stories how some in the midwest did their racism (and more from reading about it) in the 60s and 70s and 80s but I'm guessing many of those dishing it out have "forgotten". We can look up the polls on views legalizing inter-racial marriage and decriminalizing same-sex sex, and I'm guessing the percentage of people who remember being bigots is a lot smaller than the number of them that there were.
The thing is, it's possible to be complicit in bigotry without even knowing you're doing so. I posted this story once before- when I was in 7th grade, so like 11 years old, I had one of the Truly Tasteless Jokes books- these were books of jokes that were, well, truly tasteless. There were a bunch of racist jokes and I didn't get a lot of them or really even realize they were racist.

But that didn't stop me from taking one of those jokes to school and telling it, trying to puzzle out what made it funny (I didn't get it).

What made it "funny", I realized years later, was that it completely dehumanized Black people. A joke I told several times in a (almost entirely white) school, and didn't get the implications of, didn't see how awful it was. Years later I flashed back to that day and realized- Holy Smokes, that was racist AF!

I had never thought of myself as racist; I have always consciously believed that your color (or faith or gender or...) doesn't matter much, it's who you are on the inside that matters.

But I told that joke, a horrible, dehumanizing, racist joke, not realizing that it was wrong, not perceiving how it made Blacks into some kind of subhuman egg-laying monster, and it took years for me to look at that moment again with adult eyes and see that I'd contributed to racist attitudes.

So yeah. My point is, you could fully support interracial marriage and still be complicit in racist thinking or behavior, and there are so many places that it runs through our culture that it takes real effort to avoid it. I'm not making excuses for anyone; I'm pointing out that it's really easy for even people who see themselves as allies to say or do things that are racist. It's what you do afterward and how you move forward that counts.
 

I hope we can game together. It'd be cool to pull in a bunch of ENW members for a special game, in fact, but barring that it's all fun no matter the dice or the slice.

Congrats and see you there!
Indeed, because that's what it's ultimately about, right? Having fun, slaying things, taking their treasure? ;)
 

Indeed, because that's what it's ultimately about, right? Having fun, slaying things, taking their treasure? ;)
Well, yeh, that and some variation of that, plus or minus. Fun sure. Slaying things and taking their stuff, well, we graduated to a higher form during the play-tests. Well, at least some us did... :0 FUN!
 

For the record, just because he’s wrong on many fronts, does not mean that this still isn’t a dog pile.

The tone of this conversation has oft been VERY close to mob justice conversations. Keep in mind, we‘re all eventually going to get our 15 minutes of shame, and we might want to show just a smidge of mercy.
?

Their whole marketing strategy was stirring up controversy, not selling products. And in that I guess they were successful
 


But were there fewer dissenting opinions in the public discourse because attitudes were different, or were attitudes different because there were fewer dissenting opinions in the public discourse? I’m inclined to believe the latter. People didn’t just get more socially conscious out of nowhere. The people who perceived the issues, who have always been there, simply gained platforms that gave their opinions wider reach.

Fewer people that cared. Things also go in cycles and mid to late 70's into the 80's things were trending the other way.
 

Marital Rape wasn't made illegal in all 50 states until 1993. Revenge of the Nerds and Sixteen Candles were both made in 1984.

Just one year before, Deathstalker was made. A movie where sexual assault and outright rape are essentially used as a greeting between men and women. The -hero- of the movie sexually assaults multiple women and tries to rape a guy who has been magically transformed into a woman because he didn't realize there was a dude under the boobs. It's played off for comedy.

Women knew what it was. It just wasn't -legally- or socially called rape or sexual assault 'til later. And any comments about it were largely ignored or shouted down by guys who didn't want to acknowledge that they had probably committed a sexual assault thinking it was totally normal relations.

Heck. We still have dudes doing HORRIBLY RAPEY and misogynistic stuff in movies that get greenlit even though it's freaking obvious. Chris Pratt was recently in a movie where he woke up on a spaceship that would be sailing for the rest of his life and knew he was going to be alone, but he liked the look of a girl in a pod on the shelf so woke her up to condemn her to never see her friends or family again so he could have a friend and potential romance partner.

How -creepy- is that? How abjectly -terrible- is that as a concept? "I'm going to doom you to a long and dull life on a starship with no company but me 'cause I thought you looked hot and you're gonna be my wife, eventually!" And then she -does- fall in love with him because... Hollywood, I guess?
It could have made a really good horror/thriller of it had been edited just a little differently.
 


But were there fewer dissenting opinions in the public discourse because attitudes were different, or were attitudes different because there were fewer dissenting opinions in the public discourse? I’m inclined to believe the latter. People didn’t just get more socially conscious out of nowhere. The people who perceived the issues, who have always been there, simply gained platforms that gave their opinions wider reach.
Oh, I'm sure you're quite right. It's not like public opinion changes without rhyme or reason (usually) and you're right that attitudes changed because people pointed and said, "Hey, that's not cool." But pointing out that there are dissenters does not change that movies like Animal House, Revenge of the Nerds, and Sixteen Candles, each of which contains ideas that we find repugnant today, were well within established norms of the era they were produced.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top