TSR Companies & Freelancers Distance Themselves From The New TSR

The new TSR (which I refer to as TSR3 to avoid confusion) has doubled down on its stance--which has been widely condemned online--via an ongoing series of tweets and replies from its TSR Games, Giantlands, and Dungeon Hobby Museum social media accounts (possibly operated by Justin LaNasa) in an astonishing PR campaign which makes the original interview which sparked off the controversy look mild in comparison. Various entities are moving to distance themselves from the company and its activities, including TSR2, the company founded in 2011 by Jayson Elliot, which has now declared that it will not be using the name TSR any longer. Other companies including Gen Con and freelancers such as Jeff Dee have also made statements.

For reference -- TSR1 is the (no longer existing) company which launched D&D in 1974, TSR2 is the company founded by Jayson Elliot in 2011 to create Gygax Magazine and which currently publishes the Top Secret RPG, and TSR3 is the newly launched company.



Catch up on my previous coverage of this story:


TSR3's social media accounts initially sought to distance the company from Ernie Gygax's statements, but within a few hours had reversed course and doubled down on his stance. Note that there have been dozens of social media posts from the company over the last few days, and still continuing as I type this, and I don't intend to share them all here.

(Thanks to Daniel Fox for sharing screenshots below via Twitter).

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.19.46 PM.png

tsr_distance.jpeg

tsr3_gyg.jpeg


Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.00.40 PM.png

tsr3dis.jpeg

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.44.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 11.45.42 PM.png

uROPf5GL_400x400.jpg

TSR2 -- "Update to our earlier tweet - we will NOT be licensing anything from the new company claiming rights to the TSR logos. We are not working with them in any fashion."

Gen Con -- "Gen Con is not associated with TSR Games and we don't support their recent statements. While the foundation of Gen Con is tied with the history of TTRPGs, our goal is to build off the good, acknowledge the bad, and work toward a present free from racism, misogyny, and homophobia."

Gen Con has also indicated that they do not intend to allow TSR3 at the convention.

gencon.jpeg

GAMA (the Game Manufacturers Association) -- "We’re aware of the appalling statements published by TSR Games and their founder - GAMA does not condone nor agree with any part of it. We pride ourselves on supporting and promoting inclusivity always. Our motto is “A game at every table, a table for everyone”. Transphobia, racism, and sexism will not be tolerated. That means that TSR is not welcome at Origins Game Fair, GAMA Expo or any event affiliated with our organization."

Jeff Dee -- "There is a rumor going around that I am part of this new TSR company. That is not accurate. I have done some work for them as a freelance artist. That’s how I make my living, and spreading the misinformation that I’m now employed full-time by one particular client could stop other clients from approaching me and hurt my business. So, please do not spread that rumor. If I ever become a full-time employee anywhere again, I will announce that myself. Thanks. UPDATE: After investigating reports about statements made by representatives of this new TSR, I have determined that I can no longer do business with them in good conscience. I've returned their downpayment on the next piece of art I was scheduled to do for them. And yeah, I could sure use some new commissions to make up for this big hit on my cashflow"

Jim Ward, an original TSR alumnus and who wrote Giantlands, TSR3's flagship product -- "At the present time I know little or nothing about the relaunch of TSR. Right now I don't see how anyone could pick up where the old company left off. Yes it's a name with some logos, that is all I know."

Luke Gygax -- "FYI- I am not involved with any TSR company nor is Gary Con nor anyone else in my family outside of Ernie. Full stop. That is all ... I have reasons for distancing myself. The way TSR treats people online in their public exchanges is rude. The museum is a for profit business and was asking for donations. Using names of people to promote without their knowledge. Going out of the way to talk gender/woke stuff ... Also basically jacking the TSR logo from Jayson Elliot. The bombastic press releases and claims to old IP. Making a quick nostalgia money grab based on my fathers name and not much else. So I’m making it clear I don’t like this style and I have ZERO to do with TSR"

Screen Shot 2021-06-27 at 10.16.53 PM.png

TSR3 responds to Luke Gygax

Tim Kask, an original TSR alumnus who worked at the company until 1980, spoke at length on this topic in a YouTube video (below). I've transcribed some bits, but he says a whole load more (ellipses represent sections I have not included, for reasons of brevity), so check out the video for the whole thing.

"There has been bandied about in social media over the last several days several claims about what's going on in Lake Geneva right now. Ernie Gygax made a most egregious mistake in an interview he did on a podcast. He basically waved his bare ass in front of everybody that's concerned about pronouns, and woke, and all that right now in the industry and thumbed his nose at them. The transcript of his podcasts are there for everyone to read. That they were men, and they didn't give a sh*t, and la la la.

But right there they alienated three quarters of the gaming industry. Probably more than that, I don't believe that there's a quarter of the gaming industry that still are the neanderthals that he would make us out to be.

That's another thing. This whole thing has brought the OSR (the old school revival) into serious disrepute. Now there are some little Karens going on some of the social media and painting with the same brush all of us that were there back then based on the stupid ass sh*t that Ernie just said. No. We weren't all like that. And we aren't all like that now. He's a troll, a troglodyte, a neanderthal, if he really means that. It's a foolish person that doesn't wet his finger once in a while and feel the wind shift.

Now there've been claims in a couple of posts, one of which is by Ernie, about how the stalwarts, the old TSR are flocking to the banner. Bullsh*t....

... There is no one of the creative side of TSR from the early days involved with the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. No one. Not one creative person. No matter who might be claiming what, they simply do not have the credentials. Being named DiMaggio does not mean you can hit a lot of home runs. Or that you even hit any home runs ....

... Just because you say you're TSR doesn't mean you are."


 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

What did a Japanese girl in 1992 have to do with the war crimes of the Japanese state in the 1940s? As much as an American girl in 1992 had to do with the war crimes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Anyway, this is very off topic

For that generation depending on their experiences just hearing the language can trigger PTSD depending on what they experienced.

The fear was very real mostly due to propaganda in hindsight it's silly.

My grandfather had a place prepped in the hills put it that way. My grandmother was raised in that environment. The stories told were not inaccurate either.

We didn't have any trouble with the Japanese girl, neither did my mother (born during the war years).

But we had some of the strictest censorship here in those years and you would have grown up in that environment plus the propaganda.

In addition to the human wreckage left behind that she was exposed to some of her aunt's and friends couldn't get husband's because the men just weren't there they were buried in France or Turkey.
 

Can you at least appreciate that for some people, this is not some glib philosophical thought experiment but a matter of actual life and death? And why that might then spur those same people to action?
Well, forgive me! I was not speaking generally but specifically about a topic between me and another. You are personalizing this for the sake of argument, transferring my thoughts on an unrelated topic (actually off topic) into your view and for your purpose alone? If you don't like me, please ignore me or something you feel is more fitting than attacking me for merely having a inter-topical discussion with another poster I'm responding to.
 

Scots proportionally took some of the heaviest casualties.

But we didn't live through those years and there's a very big difference between living it and reading about it.

Another example. I have a friend whose family with ethnically cleansed. He over here for his kids. He left because his uncle tipped him off he was going to get killed if he stayed.

I was drinking tea with him in his restaurant and a member of said ethnic group came in to order some food. Said member had a store over the road. And flew that nations flag on his store.

He got served but I could tell he was not comfortable doing it and the other person was oblivious. Recently his father in law died, I got the gist it was preventable birdie to his families living conditions back "home" said care was unavailable.

He's not a raving racist afaik but he is definitely not comfortable around members of that nation and he's not a fan of them.

His wife is a bit more reactionary. He just prefers to avoid dealing with that nationity it's easier on him.
Sorry, fella, I think you're just flat-out wrong on this one.

Judging a "Race" on the basis of the actons of a fraction of that vague notion of a people?

It's rubbish and we shouldn't do it.

That applies to my racist Papa (whom I love) and you (who gets a lot shorter shrift)
 

So Hollywood films should be about teaching people, like after-school specials? What happened to coming up with an idea or situation, and exploring it? A What If scenario? That is a large part of what science fiction has always been about.

Anyhow, it isn't just a romance - that's one element. It isn't saying, "This is how you get hot chicks, fellas." Or, "This is totally OK to do."It is exploring an impossible scenario and while I don't think it was a great film, found it reasonably interesting and not having the malicious undercurrents that your interpretation yields. But viva la difference.
Are you seriously trying to throw out Straw Man arguments, rhetorical questions, and general condescension, right now?


This is a Romance Film with sci-fi background. This is not some philosophically deep film about the moral quandry of self-sacrifice or condemning another person to share your fate. This was MARKETED as Romance. Regardless of death of the author people went in thinking they'd see a sci-fi romance and got Gaslighting, Kidnapping, and Stockholm Syndrome, IN SPACE.

Now if you're done trying to die on this hill I'd like to move on with the discussion.
 

Did you live through the war years?

Did you get shot at, run up the beaches or see the camps?

Are you familiar with views of the war outside the western bubble eg China/Korea/Japan or in the ex USSR?

Hell we're still dealing with the fallout of WW1 let alone 2.

That's what I was getting at. I met my great grandfather as a child. Germans gassed him he survived but sounded like Darth Vader.

So for 70 years my family had been wheeling him around in a wheelchair.

The older generations were not fond of Germans. Not saying it's right but I guess they had their reasons.

America was late to the party in both wars and paid a comparatively low blood price.
I can tell you that there are still people living west of the Mississippi River harboring resentment about what Native American tribes did to defend themselves against incursions from (mostly) white settlers.

They don’t care much if you’re black, Hispanic or Asian, but if you’re part Apache or some such…
 

Well, forgive me! I was not speaking generally but specifically about a topic between me and another. You are personalizing this for the sake of argument, transferring my thoughts on an unrelated topic (actually off topic) into your view and for your purpose alone? If you don't like me, please ignore me or something you feel is more fitting than attacking me for merely having a inter-topical discussion with another poster I'm responding to.
My apologies, I thought you were speaking generally, but I see now how I was misreading it.
 


Are you seriously trying to throw out Straw Man arguments, rhetorical questions, and general condescension, right now?


This is a Romance Film with sci-fi background. This is not some philosophically deep film about the moral quandry of self-sacrifice or condemning another person to share your fate. This was MARKETED as Romance. Regardless of death of the author people went in thinking they'd see a sci-fi romance and got Gaslighting, Kidnapping, and Stockholm Syndrome, IN SPACE.

Now if you're done trying to die on this hill I'd like to move on with the discussion.
Oh, brother. How many internet stock phrases and tropes can one throw out in a single post? We've got straw man, rhetorical questions, condescension, gaslighting, stockholm, dying on a hill...to quote Darth Vader: impressive.

But yeah, we an at least agree to move on...
 

Sorry, fella, I think you're just flat-out wrong on this one.

Judging a "Race" on the basis of the actons of a fraction of that vague notion of a people?

It's rubbish and we shouldn't do it.

That applies to my racist Papa (whom I love) and you (who gets a lot shorter shrift)

People certainly shouldn't judge entire races/ethnicities/nationalities based on the actions of parts of those groups. Going by history, do a lot of people who go through enough atrocity, oppression, or war often have that pain further compounded by PTSD, depression, and other horrible difficulties? What's the way to tell those people they aren't targeting their pain induced rage appropriately? Just not having it passed to the next generation almost feels like a big victory compared to what has happened historically in many places.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top