Black Widow

[MarkB]

Nah. Bond never exhibits superhuman durability like Black Widow (he would survive falls like that through luck, landing on a hay-filled trailer or something, rather than bounce off a few metal railings, and then stand up again), and nothing even comes close to that final aerial showdown.

Pre-Daniel Craig Bond would get by on luck, but Daniel Craig regularly goes through some seriously bone-crunching action sequences.

 

[hopeless]

In Casino Royale he went through the literal wringer!
It sounded like they should have revealed she carried some SHIELD tech that allowed her to slow her fall like some one use glider or force field projector so when she landed it drops to the ground expended and she's just winded instead of seriously hurt?

 

[Morrus]

Pre-Daniel Craig Bond would get by on luck, but Daniel Craig regularly goes through some seriously bone-crunching action sequences.

Not even close to the feats in Black Widow though. The one might be a similar car crash — which put Bond out of action, but Widow climbed out and fought a supervillain.

 

[Tonguez]

Personally they're also right.
They've killed off Tony Stark, Cap has returned having lived all those years he spent returning to his past, Thor is out there travelling to recover from the massive losses as seen in Infinity Wars so what does that leave us?

Shang-Chi introduces the Mandarin an Iron Man villain, but he's dead I hear you say well make a movie set between Iron Man 1 and 2 or after 3 and use him in that movie!

Same goes for Black Widow, the character is dead in the present, but not the past!

What's stopping them from making such a movie in the near future but set before her death in Endgame?

There's nothing as far as I can see unless they think building the Thunderbolts the same way they built the Avengers will make them as much money.

Will it?

they dont even need time travel now, the multiverse allows them to have versions of the timeline where Stark or Black widow didnt die at all. If you've seen the What If ... trailers then we've already seen a non-Cap Variant of Steve Rogers.

However having Tony Stark back for another Iron Man movie would be bad form, it cheapens the impact of death in the MCU story arc.

Thunderbolts probably wont have the same cashcow potential as the Avengers but then I dont think Marvel will drop the Avengers anyway. The existence of the Spiderman movies has already proven that audiences can handle multiple teams and a new Avengers team is already being introduced alongside the Thunderbolts team,not to mention the promise of Fantastic 4 at the end of this new phase. As long as audiences keep buying its guaranteed that Disney will keep churning out product

 

[Maxperson]

To be fair, we did get a very good mirror fight, it just didn't feature Taskmaster. The fight between Natasha and Yelena in Budapest was very well done.

Budapesht.

 

[Maxperson]

Yeah someone on the team must actually think Thanos plan makes sense, because the film plays it as something that would work, but at an unacceptable cost.

And a complete lack of thought. If he lowered birthrates for a while, he could have brought the universe to half population without killing anyone. Or he could have used the gauntlet to create more resources, so the universe never runs out. His plan doesn't play as something that works at all.

 

[Tonguez]

Budapesht.

Budapescht (don't forget the c )

 

[Morrus]

And a complete lack of thought. If he lowered birthrates for a while, he could have brought the universe to half population without killing anyone. Or he could have used the gauntlet to create more resources, so the universe never runs out. His plan doesn't play as something that works at all.

Well, he is called the Mad Titan.

 

[MarkB]

Budapesht.

You and I remember Budapest very differently.

 

[Maxperson]

Well, he is called the Mad Titan.

Yes, but as @Umbran pointed out, they really didn't do anything other than the plan that showed that. He seemed very rational, if fanatic, but not insane.