D&D and the rising pandemic


log in or register to remove this ad


Yeah… 600,00 dead isn’t worth it.

Gotta destroy property.

Actually, yes. Some humans have a problem extending beyond mere proximal empathy. Same reason they won't wear masks or get vaccinated. In reality, those are measures to be kind to their fellow humans, and they just can't concieve needing to do things for people they don't know, especially if those people are Them, the outgroup.

sigh. And we wonder what The Great Filter might be?
 

Or, well, use the vernacular of the time. Set aside some vaccine, rebrand it Hyrdroxiverzinc or soemthing, and say, "Friends! Here's the stuff that They don't want you to know about! Big Pharma and the FDA don't want to talk about it, but it will SPERCHARGE your immune system, and make covid fears a thing of the past...."

(Note intentional misspelling of "supercharge". It adds folksy verisimilitude.)
Needs more "XTREME!" in the marketing.
 

Yeah… 600,00 dead isn’t worth it.

Gotta destroy property.

Or maybe... cost taxpayer dollars? It looks like hospitalization of unvaccinated folks cost the US over $2 billion in just June and July this year.

 



How depressing that good ol' fashioned "selfish azzhattery" could be a universal biological constant.

But... terribly plausible. Being merely the functional result of typical evolution -high technology requires large numbers of sentient creatures. Truly large population densities of sentient creatures doesn't happen until some base technology is created, which is typically after the fundamental psychology of the creature is set - so that fundamental psychology has some form of a Dunbar Number, set as some low multiple of the number of individuals a small tribal group might typically contain. It may be in the hundreds, but not in the tens of thousands.

Your chance to reach the stars is predicated on a species developing empathy far outside its Dunbar Number. If you don't, you don't go to space, because just around where you develop the technology to go to space, your people wind up too entangled in internecine struggles to go further. This point may also correspond to the point where the population is sufficiently large to seriously impact planetary ecology.

Basically - you have to be very lucky for your people to become interested enough in the collective welfare that a transition to space is possible.
 


But... terribly plausible. Being merely the functional result of typical evolution -high technology requires large numbers of sentient creatures. Truly large population densities of sentient creatures doesn't happen until some base technology is created, which is typically after the fundamental psychology of the creature is set - so that fundamental psychology has some form of a Dunbar Number, set as some low multiple of the number of individuals a small tribal group might typically contain. It may be in the hundreds, but not in the tens of thousands.

Your chance to reach the stars is predicated on a species developing empathy far outside its Dunbar Number. If you don't, you don't go to space, because just around where you develop the technology to go to space, your people wind up too entangled in internecine struggles to go further. This point may also correspond to the point where the population is sufficiently large to seriously impact planetary ecology.

Basically - you have to be very lucky for your people to become interested enough in the collective welfare that a transition to space is possible.
So the only thing that's keeping us from the future predicted by "Idiocracy" is Covid?
 

Remove ads

Top