D&D 5E Some Fizban's Treasury of Dragons sneak peek previews

[Urriak Uruk]

No way of knowing that until the book is released. For example, there isn't an Aspect of Saridor listed, even though we know he's covered in the book.

I think it was said previously that Sadior may be covered, but he's not getting Aspect statistics. He's not on par with Tiamat/Bahamut (who were created in Io's death).

 

[Weiley31]

Worse case, one can always just refluff your choice of the Aspect of Bahamut/Tiamat and just swap out the Breath Weapon element type with whatever seems appropriate.

The only dragon type that I wish was in there was Purple Dragons, but there were already a crap-ton of different dragon types in 3.0/3.5 that it all got a bit confusing keeping track. But we have Shadow Dragons so I'm happy. Steel Dragons though, are probably not going to be accounted for and its gonna be another case of refluffing Silver/whatever as a template or something.

 

[Parmandur]

Worse case, one can always just refluff your choice of the Aspect of Bahamut/Tiamat and just swap out the Breath Weapon element type with whatever seems appropriate.

The only dragon type that I wish was in there was Purple Dragons, but there were already a crap-ton of different dragon types in 3.0/3.5 that it all got a bit confusing keeping track. But we have Shadow Dragons so I'm happy. Steel Dragons though, are probably not going to be accounted for and its gonna be another case of refluffing Silver/whatever as a template or something.

Deep Dragons are Purple Dragons.

 

[Dire Bare]

Deep Dragons are Purple Dragons.

All deep dragons are purple dragons. But not all purple dragons are deep dragons.

The catalog of dragon types in D&D's long history is vast . . . . .

 

[Henadic Theologian]

Does anyone know if this book makes Tarkir or Council of Wyrms dmsguild legal?

 

[Henadic Theologian]

All deep dragons are purple dragons. But not all purple dragons are deep dragons.

The catalog of dragon types in D&D's long history is vast . . . . .

In this edition the Deep Dragons aren't purple, I hate it.

 

[Scribe]

Does anyone know if this book makes Tarkir or Council of Wyrms dmsguild legal?

Tarkir the MTG setting?? Doubtful at best.

 

[Henadic Theologian]

Tarkir the MTG setting?? Doubtful at best.

why?

 

[Micah Sweet]

In this edition the Deep Dragons aren't purple, I hate it.

In the recently released Monster Manual Expanded III on DMs Guild, they are purple.

 

[Scribe]

why?

I thought only settings with setting books got added?

I don’t see anything that would stop me from publishing a Greyhawk or Zendikar or Dark Sun product on DMs Guild. Can I do that?​

For now, DMs Guild is limited to the Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, Eberron, Ravnica, and Theros settings only, although you can also publish anything for 5th Edition that (i) is generic enough to be used in a permitted setting without effort and (ii) doesn’t explicitly use anything related to another official Wizards setting.