Ovinomancer
No flips for you!
Oh. Your complaint was that the stance that's not acceptable in these threads is that "passive" and "sharply bounded" are not equated? That's very weird, because that just came up for the first time a few posts ago. I completely misunderstood that your post was rebuking @Thomas Shey for introducing "sharply bounded" as a better descriptor for players that do not want to provide fiction outside of a limited scope consisting only of their PC as a better, but equivalent term for the previously used "passive." I'm on board now. I think it's kinda playing semantics as well.Which was not my complaint. My complaint was that people equate "passive" and "sharply" bounded, like you just did.