Spelljammer Spelljammer Confirmed (MAYBE, April Fools?)

[RoughCoronet0]

That’s just crappy people. I actually don’t see ANY of that.

I’m sincerely happy that you never had to experience such crappy behavior. I have not been so fortune. I still have a visible scar from when a group of senior girls pushed me down a flight of stair as part of an April Fool’s joke. People suck sometimes. Still, I agree that this is mostly a harmless joke though I can understand people not finding it or April Fool’s funny in general.

On a more jovial note, what would be a really funny (and maybe cruel) twist is that after making this joke about Spelljammer, they wait til Monday only to announce Planescape.

 

[Parmandur]

Whoever loses must direct the next Avatar movie.

No, that's just cruel.

 

[Quickleaf]

If there is a Spelljammer book this year, I pick the other poster's Avatar for a year. If there is no, they can pick mine.

@Quickleaf I promise to be magnanimous in victory.

I too shall be magnanimous as a content hampster in your victory... no... wait... that wasn't the comeback I was looking for.

Darnit. I'm too nice for the internet. I think I broke it.

 

[Yaarel]

Get angry @darjr - angry you must get. (Avatar bet is when whoever loses bet must change their avatar for a month, a year, or whatever)

Sure, I'm in for an avatar bet @Parmandur ! I mean, I kinda think you're right, but just for fun I'll take the bet anyhow.

Here: I have some suggestions for suitably angry avatars...

Lol, sometimes I dont understand old schoolers. Rabbits are bad, owls are bad, dragons are bad, ... but hamsters are ok.

 

[Jer]

Can't wait until we get the announcement so we can all move from the "they'll never make 5e Spelljammer" phase and into the "they're going to screw up Spelljammer" phase of the 5e lifecycle. Then after the book is published we can move into the "detailed arguments about how they screwed it up and how the book should have been written" phase. Circle of Life.

 

[Quickleaf]

I have full moral certititude, on solid evidentiary grounds. If you want in on the Avatar bet, let me know.

You played "spin the hampster", and the little guy ended pointed up towards the stars?

 

[Fenris-77]

There are some decent cannibal Ewok avatars. Those are at least hamster-adjacent.

 

[Parmandur]

You played "spin the hampster", and the little guy ended pointed up towards the stars?

Nah, we just have too much evidence pointing to Peekins making a Spelljammer product. The last time I recall there being such a preponderance of evidence for the next product was Undermountain, though I was on the wrong side of speculation there (and with Tasha's, too).

 

[Quickleaf]

Nah, we just have too much evidence pointing to Peekins making a Spelljammer product. The last time I recall there being such a preponderance of evidence for the next product was Undermountain, though I was on the wrong side of speculation there (and with Tasha's, too).

We know your predictive algorithim's weaknesses, Parmandur. We have been studying you. Let my cute toupee lull your defenses. The cranium hampster sees all.

Besides, the first letter in Perkins is a "P", and we all know that stands for "Pellinore."

 

[darjr]

Whoever loses must direct the next Avatar movie.

Wait! Can I lose on purpose?!