D&D 5E Heroes of Krynn UA Survey is up

[darjr]

D&D UA Survey 60 (Heroes of Krynn Revisited)

D&D UA Survey 60 (Heroes of Krynn Revisited).

survey.alchemer.com

 

[humble minion]

That's got to be some sort of record for shortest time between UA and survey, surely?

 

[darjr]

Yea. Wonder if it means anything

 

[DND_Reborn]

Done.

 

[Scribe]

Yea. Wonder if it means anything

Means they read the thread we have here and its time to blow up their survey lol.

 

[Parmandur]

That's got to be some sort of record for shortest time between UA and survey, surely?

The Races of Ravnica UA survey went up darn near immediately, because they were almost to print.

 

[Jer]

Yea. Wonder if it means anything

Means the book is coming out before the end of the year and it needs to go to print.

 

[Scribe]

1. Character Rules? Very Dissatisfied. Boring.

2. Kender? Very Dissatisfied.

"Give the Kender back a 'magical pocket' and simply indicate its up to the player how items get there. It doesnt need to be magical, LET THEM BE THIEVES."

3. Feats: Fine.
4. KoS: Fine.

5. Mages of High Sorcery? Very dissatisfied. Add back Alignment restriction.

Blah blah.

Additional Comments?

"Add back Alignment restrictions.
Add back the Race default Ability Score assignment.
Add back a 'magic pocket' for Kender, and let them be thieves!"

 

[Parmandur]

Yea. Wonder if it means anything

They want to finalize the book soon?

I bemoaned the loss of Kender Ace, and said the Kender without it feel like any Halfling.

I also praised the Background Feats to the high heavens, emphasizing thst I hate normal Feats (I started with 3E, can you tell?), but I love this setup.

 

[cbwjm]

I went from being disillusioned with some of the changes they'd made to things in the first UA, that I didn't even bother with the survey. This time I went in to say that I'm liking the revision.