D&D 5E Speculation thread! Vecna? Giants UA?

Depends on the Subreddit. The first comment on DNDLeaks was a "clearly for a Giant Fizban book."

OP is on my team tho!

1653937366141.png
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I remember that was the 4E explanation for why Dark Sun doesn't have gods.
It would be cool it WOTC did a chart of pantheons and explain what happened if 2 of them fought in a world and one side loss.

WorldPantheon 1Pantheon 2Result
Nentir ValeDawn WarPrimordialDawn War victory
Dark SunDawn WarPrimordialsPrimordial Victory
TitanomachyOlympiansTitansOlympian Victory
PhlegraOlympiansTitansTitan Victory
PrimevalDawn WarGiants/JotunGiant/Jotun Victory
PrimordialNorseGiants/JotunGiant/Jotun Victory
New MidgardNorseGiants/JotunNorse (Pyrrhic) Victory
Old MidgardNorseGiants/JotunWar not started
 





At first I thought the Vecna stuff might just be to promote the new season of Stranger Things and a new mini. But looking at the art, they've got what appears to be a mortal wielding both the Eye and Hand. Which, if it was just for the one Vecna miniature, there wouldn't be a need for. I suspect that we're going to see some sort of adventure path involving the Whispered One. The other option is some sort of guide sourcebook, maybe involving undead or perhaps artifacts.

View attachment 249301

Which, looking at that art, it kinda looks like Lord Neverember. But then again, there are probably umpteen million NPCs out there meet the criteria of "long brown hair, beard, greying, wears crown/circlet."

I cannot think of anything that the Giants-related content might be. Every time I think, oh, maybe its a re-release and expansion of Storm Kings Thunder, or Dark Sun, or whatever, just as many reasons why it won't be that come to mind.
If that image is not just abstractly representing the Hand & Eye, and is intended to represent a specific NPC, that brings up the question of has Arkhan the Cruel lost the Hand?

In Critical Role, Joe Mangianello's PC Arkhan took the Hand. This later became canon in Baldur's Gate: Descent into Avernus: "...the dragonborn warrior researches ways to assert his will over the artifact known as the Hand of Vecna, so he can use its secrets to free the evil dragon queen Tiamat from the Nine Hells."
 



In my view, the First World looks to be an attempt to collate, consolidate, and reincorporate this old lore into 5E to re-knit things like Planescape, Spelljammer, and a Multiverse.
This would be correct. Which means, if the did do a First World campaign setting (which I doubt very much) it would be a core rules setting, since it's raison d'etre is it's the place from which the core rules originate.

I would see a hypothetical First World setting as Nentir Vale 2.0:

1) Core rules
2) Contains everything from every world in the D&D multiverse
3) Dominated by dragons/dragonborn rather than humans
4) is in the process of an apocalypse
5) Points of Light. The PCs are trying to save things from the destruction to come.

And as such is unrelated to anything in the current UA.

Meanwhile, even ignoring the rules issues, there is no purpose in a dinosaurs and caveman setting, since there is nowhere in the D&D multiverse where dinosaurs (or mammoths, dire wolves etc) are extinct.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top