Legatus Legionis
< BWAH HA Ha ha >
.
Last edited:
Yeah, its a major design flaw In Wizard designI don't know. When 5e wizards aren't asked to give anything up to be a "specialist wizard" - e.g., spells of other traditions, etc. - are there wizards that aren't generalist wizards?
I don't think specialization needs to mean that a wizard is deficient in other areas. I feel that's kind of a balancing mechanic held over from 2e.I don't know. When 5e wizards aren't asked to give anything up to be a "specialist wizard" - e.g., spells of other traditions, etc. - are there wizards that aren't generalist wizards?
Fine...I don't want to tamp down the conversation, but there's a companion thread for discussing the Wizard subclasses and the Survivor thread, to keep this one from filling up with commentary. Drop in and join us!
D&D 5E - Companion thread to 5E Survivor - Subclasses (Part XIV: Wizard)
Maybe not, but the result IME is that a lot of wizards end up taking the same spells over and over again regardless of subclass, so a lot of wizards end up looking alike in terms of spell selection. I used to feel the same way as you, but I kinda would almost welcome it, if only, for more variability between wizards that I see. But maybe One D&D will give wizards a narrower range of Arcane spells but then providing greater access to school traditions with their choice of subclass.