WotC Announces OGL 1.1 -- Revised Terms, Royalties, and Annual Revenue Reporting

There has been a lot of speculation recently about WotC's plans regarding the Open Gaming License and the upcoming One D&D. Today, WotC shared some information.

In short, they will be producing a new Open Gaming License (note that the previous OGL 1.0a will still exist, and can still be used). However, for those who use the new OGL 1.1, which will be released in early 2023, there will be some limitations added with regards the type of product which can use it, and -- possibly controversially -- reporting to WotC your annual OGL-related revenue.

They are also adding a royalty for those third party publishers who make more than $750K per year.

Interestingly, only books and 'static electronic files' like ebooks and PDFs will be compatible with the new OGL, meaning that apps, web pages, and the like will need to stick to the old OGL 1.0a.

There will, of course, be a lot of debate and speculation over what this actually means for third party creators, and how it will affect them. Some publishers like Paizo (for Pathfinder) and others will likely simply continue to use the old OGL. The OGL 1.0a allows WotC to update the license, but allows licensees to continue to use previous versions "to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License".


wotc-new-logo-3531303324.jpg



1. Will One D&D include an SRD/be covered by an OGL?

Yes. First, we’re designing One D&D with fifth edition backwards compatibility, so all existing creator content that is compatible with fifth edition will also be compatible with One D&D. Second, we will update the SRD for One D&D as we complete its development—development that is informed by the results of playtests that we’re conducting with hundreds of thousands of D&D players now.

2. Will the OGL terms change?

Yes. We will release version 1.1 of the OGL in early 2023.

The OGL needs an update to ensure that it keeps doing what it was intended to do—allow the D&D community’s independent creators to build and play and grow the game we all love—without allowing things like third-parties to mint D&D NFTs and large businesses to exploit our intellectual property.

So, what’s changing?

First, we’re making sure that OGL 1.1 is clear about what it covers and what it doesn’t. OGL 1.1 makes clear it only covers material created for use in or as TTRPGs, and those materials are only ever permitted as printed media or static electronic files (like epubs and PDFs). Other types of content, like videos and video games, are only possible through the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy or a custom agreement with us. To clarify: Outside of printed media and static electronic files, the OGL doesn’t cover it.

Will this affect the D&D content and services players use today? It shouldn’t. The top VTT platforms already have custom agreements with Wizards to do what they do. D&D merchandise, like minis and novels, were never intended to be part of the OGL and OGL 1.1 won’t change that. Creators wishing to leverage D&D for those forms of expression will need, as they always have needed, custom agreements between us.

Second, we’re updating the OGL to offer different terms to creators who choose to make free, share-alike content and creators who want to sell their products.

What does this mean for you as a creator? If you’re making share-alike content, very little is going to change from what you’re already used to.

If you’re making commercial content, relatively little is going to change for most creators. For most of you who are selling custom content, here are the new things you’ll need to do:
  1. Accept the license terms and let us know what you’re offering for sale
  2. Report OGL-related revenue annually (if you make more than $50,000 in a year)
  3. Include a Creator Product badge on your work
When we roll out OGL 1.1, we will also provide explanatory videos, FAQs, and a web portal for registration to make navigating these requirements as easy and intuitive as possible. We’ll also have help available to creators to navigate the new process.

For the fewer than 20 creators worldwide who make more than $750,000 in income in a year, we will add a royalty starting in 2024. So, even for the creators making significant money selling D&D supplements and games, no royalties will be due for 2023 and all revenue below $750,000 in future years will be royalty-free.

Bottom line: The OGL is not going away. You will still be able to create new D&D content, publish it anywhere, and game with your friends and followers in all the ways that make this game and community so great. The thousands of creators publishing across Kickstarter, DMsGuild, and more are a critical part of the D&D experience, and we will continue to support and encourage them to do that through One D&D and beyond.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

mamba

Legend
Again, you're talking about them requiring proof of sales, receipts, complete breakdowns of sales and whatnot. Which, sure, is confidential information. But, that's a heck of a lot more than sales. Companies routinely report their sales for the year. Hell, we KNOW, almost to the dollar, what WotC's D&D sales were last year. We know because it's been reported.
Public companies do, most 3PPs are not that. Hasbro is, and yet they do not really break down the WotC numbers between MtG and D&D... so yeah, tell me to the closest 100 $ how much D&D made in 2021 and 2022...
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Hussar

Legend
Public companies do, most 3PPs are not that. Hasbro is, and yet they do not really break down the WotC numbers between MtG and D&D... so yeah, tell me to the closest 100 $ how much D&D made in 2021 and 2022...
I don't need to though. I just need to tell you within 650 000 dollars how much they made.

2021, WotC is reported to make 816 million dollars according to my very quick Google search. Granted, they don't break it down between Magic and D&D and other brands, but, I know how much they made. Are you seriously suggesting that WotC will require more detail than this? "How much money in sales did your OGL products make in the past year?" is going to be the extent of the question. Since they don't care until you hit that 700k mark, why would they need any more detail than that? Hell, like I said, the simple Y/N question is potentially all they will ask.

We know that they will ask something. We don't know what specifically. Which brings me right back around to the hyperbolic comparisons of the titanic hitting an iceberg and a potential murderer invading your home. Yes, I am quite aware what anaolgy means and I know that you are picking very specific ones to connote a very specific meaning to cast WotC as the villain despite having zero information or reason.

At the moment, all we know is that they will require some form of income reporting. We have no idea what form that will take. You are presuming that it will be invasive and objectionable. I am presuming nothing and am perfectly willing to wait a couple of weeks while they prepare what the actual terms will be. Considering this won't actually apply until, what, more than a year in the future, there's LOTS of time to ready your torches and pitchforks without working yourself up on completely fabricated hypotheticals.
 
Last edited:


Hussar

Legend
you were the one claiming you can, sounds like you cannot after all... but fine, how much was it and where did you find it? Also, why 650k?
I did state that it was a very quick Google search. 650k is where the royalties start. Well, 650 after the first 50k which requires no reporting.
 

mamba

Legend
I did state that it was a very quick Google search.
then you should have no trouble finding it, I'll wait

EDIT: Here's the thing, if you knew how Hasbro reports (or actually read what I wrote earlier), you'd know that the WotC numbers are not broken down between MtG and D&D. So I don't think you can even get to the closest 1M. So I expect to wait a long time...
 
Last edited:

Hussar

Legend
then you should have no trouble finding it, I'll wait

EDIT: Here's the thing, if you knew how Hasbro reports (or actually read what I wrote earlier), you'd know that the WotC numbers are not broken down between MtG and D&D. So I don't think you can even get to the closest 1M. So I expect to wait a long time...
Speaking of reading what's being written - I did specifically mention that it wasn't broken apart between product lines. But, again, you have no reason to think that they will require more than simply total sales. What more do you think they are going to ask?
 

mamba

Legend
Speaking of reading what's being written - I did specifically mention that it wasn't broken apart between product lines. But, again, you have no reason to think that they will require more than simply total sales. What more do you think they are going to ask?
I did miss that you edited your post since I read it, so yes, I did indeed miss that. So I guess you were wrong when you wrote

Hell, we KNOW, almost to the dollar, what WotC's D&D sales were last year. We know because it's been reported.
 

mamba

Legend
At the moment, all we know is that they will require some form of income reporting. We have no idea what form that will take. You are presuming that it will be invasive and objectionable. I am presuming nothing and am perfectly willing to wait a couple of weeks while they prepare what the actual terms will be. Considering this won't actually apply until, what, more than a year in the future, there's LOTS of time to ready your torches and pitchforks without working yourself up on completely fabricated hypotheticals.
going back to the edited part of your post... yes we have no idea what the terms will be, what you seem to miss is that I completely reject any requirement to register or report income, let alone require a fee at any level.

The actual terms do not matter to me, drop this and I am fine (well, also leave VTTs covered, not just print and PDF), leave it in and I am not. I have written that a few times already.

Basically I want the license to remain open, and am even willing to sacrifice some (many actually) cases it formerly could be used for.
 
Last edited:

Hussar

Legend
Requiring sales reporting =/= closed license. But, yeah, if your position is that "I completely reject any requirement to register or report income", then, ok, fair enough. That's on you. To me, it's a pretty minor requirement that will take all of 30 seconds for most people. I'm not really seeing the issue to be honest.

VTT's I think are going to have a problem. AFAIK, most VTT's don't include an OGL with their product, nor is there one to be found. Additionally, their SRD modules are not people readable, if they even have it broken out that way. And I think that people who are scraping from D&D Beyond and then selling modules are going to find that getting shut down very soon as well.
 

Remove ads

Latest threads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top