Bedrockgames
I post in the voice of Christopher Walken
Again, there were no threats of violence. There were, in the light most favorable to Mr. Cannon, threats of legal repercussions.
This is what is making the discussion difficult- yes, someone can be intimidated by people showing up and letting you know that there is a possibility that you might be liable (civilly and/or criminally). But as unpleasant as that can be, there's a big difference between that and having someone physically threaten you.
I think anytime a company threatens customers with legal action, though lawyers if through security agencies, it is going to be read as intimidating, because the company has resources you don’t and litigation isn’t something most people can afford, and prison time isn’t something most people want to risk. Now there is a sliding scale here of appropriateness. If someone is harassing WOTC employees, breaking into their warehouse, stealing (and not like a pack of early release cards but something more serious), etc then I get sending a letter from a lawyer or something. But just based on what we’ve seen here this seems like a big overreaction. It also seems like something where WOTC should understand how badly it can play out (they are going after a guy who talks about their products online, there are just better ways to handle that scenario purely from a business and PR perspective)
I haven’t had anything like this happen. But I received a letter from a company lawyer once (not gaming related) and it was extremely intimidating. I would have capitulated if I hadn’t consulted with a lawyer who basically said was bluster and nothing to worry about. I think anytime a person a with expertise explicitly or tacitly threatens legal action people feel incredibly intimidated. I also once had to appear in court for a driving without a license charge that was the product of a mistake made by my insurance company (which caused me to lose my license without knowing about it). It has been ages so my details might be off. I was arrested and had to appear before a judge after spending the night in our city jail. When I was brought out even though I knew this was the product of a paperwork error I was told by the judge I could pay a small fine or have a jury trial with a possibility if a larger find and something like up to a year in prison. As certain as I was (and later when I contacted the RMV and insurance company the certainty was confirmed), I just plead guilty and paid the find because the cost benefit in my head was, if this jury trial goes south for any reason, or I am wrong about the paperwork, I could spend a year in prison (and a night in jail was enough for me to formulate my opinion on that prospect). The judge wasn’t doing anything wrong. He was very reasonable but my point is just how intimidated people do feel when a person who seems to have any authority, even a Pinkerton agent, starts talking legal consequences. Especially with the prison system being the way it is here. And do you often do what you are asked to avoid catastrophic consequences even if you know or feel you are in the right