WotC may have sent the Pinkertons to a magic leakers home. Update: WotC confirms it and has a response.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem here is that we don't know if there was forced entry.

Overall, though, it's a pretty sad way of looking at the world. The fraction of the world that thinks that there is a public safety concern that needs to be addressed by a Castle Doctrine is not large enough to be consequential. But they do think the way they do for a reason. I can't imagine what that reason is, but it's worth asking.
Well, there have been studies about just that, but they have nothing to do with this particular case and are way outside the appropriate subject matter for this forum, bit Googling "Stand Your Ground" or "Castle Doctrine" and various political words produces informative reading.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Engaging in detail does make a story more relevant in my eyes, yes. Especially because the more detailed a narration is, the more easily disproven it becomes if it's a bunch of lies. By going in detail while being untruthful, you're more likely to get caught in a lie later, so liars often try to avoid saying too much.
Actually its quite the opposite. Liars tend to give more details.
 

My comment is predicated on the foot int he door statement being true. There's a reason why "police auditors" and Constitutional Law folks say to not even open the door for police, when they come knocking. The concept of foot-in-the-door is apparently rather murky, depending upon your (American) jurisdiction and applicable case law, even when actual police are involved.
I'm sure that there are situations where the concept of a 'police auditor', etc. makes sense and is necessary. I get a little yikesed out when folks start clamoring for this approach on every police interaction, but I do understand the concern, and the necessity in many cases.
 


It would be an interesting legal argument. Pinkerton agents are routinely armed, in the US. This would mean you have an armed trespasser, on your property, who is essentially forcing entry. In a place like Florida or Texas, given past cases involving Castle Doctrine, I could see it flying there.
I believe what you meant to say is that in Florida and Texas you're required to open your door blasting, just in case the person knocking intended to force their way in.
 






Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top