D&D (2024) What type of ranger would your prefer for 2024?

What type of ranger?

  • Spell-less Ranger

    Votes: 59 48.4%
  • Spellcasting Ranger

    Votes: 63 51.6%

Out of curiosity, why would Druids be busted if they had 2 attacks and a fighting style? It's not like we don't have other full casters with Extra Attack, and most Fighting Styles provide fairly minor benefits.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Out of curiosity, why would Druids be busted if they had 2 attacks and a fighting style? It's not like we don't have other full casters with Extra Attack, and most Fighting Styles provide fairly minor benefits.
Those classes have curated spell lists to not have many combat bonuses. Or limited extra attacks.

Because that's so much better than being a Triceratops? I promise you no one will take that subclass.

Two attacks and a fighting style is the literal bare minimum you give a class when you don't care about them at all.
A Triceratops has 13 AC and can't cast spells.
 

Out of curiosity, why would Druids be busted if they had 2 attacks and a fighting style? It's not like we don't have other full casters with Extra Attack, and most Fighting Styles provide fairly minor benefits.
IMO. Only issue I see is creating even more caster classes that overshadow martials in almost all respects.

Powerwise it's not really much more powerful than Druids already are. It's just it further detracts from one of the few things that martial classes can do.
 

IMO. Only issue I see is creating even more caster classes that overshadow martials in almost all respects.

Powerwise it's not really much more powerful than Druids already are. It's just it further detracts from one of the few things that martial classes can do.
making 2 attacks with a bow and archery style is not more powerful than a cantrip that you can add your casting modifier to damage.
Especially when you get to level 11.

But martials, need more attacks or more riders on attacks or both.
 






Remove ads

Top