Vaalingrade
Legend
What we need is a slew of level 1 feats for ancestry of all types. Including human.
Can you give the precise quote, please? Or page number?SCAG talks about it, just a flavor thing for Mulan Tieflongs and Aasamir.
After seeing Ifrit's from pathfinder (their version of fire genasi), I built a fire genasi character with horns. I hate how 5e has basically turned genasi/aasimar into just 'red humans/blue humans/gold humans'.In OG Planescape Tieflings, Genasi, and Aasimar could pretty much look like whatever you wanted them to look like, but appearance was completely unique, as long as they had the usual arrangement of limbs (plus tail) and such for humaniods you were fine (although original Tieflings, Aasimar, and Genasi were Not concider humaniods, they were Outsiders or in current terms, Fiends, Celestials, and Elemental, it was only later in 3.5e when they because a major Forgotten Realms races, that they released a humanoid version, one that also didn't a level adjustment).
That's why I'd like to give half-elves and half-orcs their own species names, and assume the hybridisation happened a long time ago. Basically making them their own full fledged species. This is especially important for eberron where this is explicitly the case.So, in so many words, tradition.
As I’ve said, if hybrid species are a thing, it makes sense to support more than just those two specific combinations. And there just ain’t room to include full species write ups for every combination. So, a simple, generic system to accommodate whatever combination the player might want makes sense. Also, removing their write ups opens up page count, so now we get full-blooded orcs and Goliaths in the PHB. Win-win.
They were under 70%, but apparently we're broadly liked: just not "put thst in the PHB liked. Crawford said they would revisit them in some form...and I suspect they may make it into the MM, because Celestisls have a lot of slots to fill to meet the "options at every tier" threshold.Who said Ardlings scored well? Not WotC, that I can recall. Quite the contrary.
I'm not at home ATM, but it is in there: I'll try to check thst out tomorrow.Can you give the precise quote, please? Or page number?
There's reference on p. 118 about alternate forms of Tieflings (though none with animal heads), and a short sidebar on p. 119 about Aasimar (but nothing about animal heads).
Agreed. There are % tables in Blood of Angels and Blood of Fiends that would allow you to customize your Aasimar's or your Tiefling's looks (much more than what even 3e offered). The Geniekin (the PF equivalent of the Genasi) sadly don't have their own % table for you to customize your character with. But I think you could borrow the % tables of the other two for 5e without any problem.After seeing Ifrit's from pathfinder (their version of fire genasi), I built a fire genasi character with horns. I hate how 5e has basically turned genasi/aasimar into just 'red humans/blue humans/gold humans'.
The Dragonkin (Kobold Press' take on the Dragonborn) are good example of hybridization that happened a long time ago. Originally they were Half-Dragon humans. So why not make the Half-Elves and Half-Orcs into races that bred true?That's why I'd like to give half-elves and half-orcs their own species names, and assume the hybridisation happened a long time ago. Basically making them their own full fledged species. This is especially important for eberron where this is explicitly the case.