Weiley31
Legend
THAT was the first game I played in the series and made me a fan ever since.It helps a lot when said Dragon's fang has the exact dimensions and properties of a steel sword...
View attachment 294590
THAT was the first game I played in the series and made me a fan ever since.It helps a lot when said Dragon's fang has the exact dimensions and properties of a steel sword...
View attachment 294590
It's a really great game. And thanks to many, many, many times replaying the levels due to instant respawns and those damn birds, the chiptune soundtrack is permanently etched into my memory.THAT was the first game I played in the series and made me a fan ever since.
That's like saying the Eldritch knight can take shield and fireball and is the bulk of a wizard.You take a battlemaster and give them the Commander's strike and Rally maneuvers....and to me you have the bulk of the "warlord" that has been shown in 4e.
Fine. The Dungeon & Dragons movie was crap, Keeping Up with the Kardashians is high art, and Richard Nixon was a great president. Is that your take? There can be no objective measure of quality except popularity?Or they were not great movies, the Reality shows were higher quality than you think, they're not bad politicians, etc.. You're just substituting your preferences for "right," while saying others doing that with those things are "wrong" because...their tastes are not yours?
I think popularity is also not a measure of quality. It's a subjective topic. It's high art to some and low art to others, and entirely depends on the perspective of the viewer. Saying people have a bad track record based on their gut instincts is just another way of saying your tastes are superior. They're not. All tastes are equal. Popularity is just measuring what portion of people have similar tastes.Fine. The Dungeon & Dragons movie was crap, Keeping Up with the Kardashians is high art, and Richard Nixon was a great president. Is that your take? There can be no objective measure of quality except popularity?
Hands and object size don't matter, all improvised weapons do 1d4 damage... unless you can convince your DM that they are similar to an existing weapon. Which is why we're harping on about the subclass relying on DM goodwill.So... wait. Does the Brawler's Improvised Weapons only do d4's (1-handed) and d6's (2-handed)?
I think popularity is also not a measure of quality. It's a subjective topic. It's high art to some and low art to others, and entirely depends on the perspective of the viewer. Saying people have a bad track record based on their gut instincts is just another way of saying your tastes are superior. They're not. All tastes are equal. Popularity is just measuring what portion of people have similar tastes.
I've seen your argument used countless times in the nerd field to denigrate novels for example. I've seen people say the Harry Potter books are trash because they're not written a certain way. I've seen people say the Twilight novels are trash because they're not written a certain way. I've even seen people say the Lord of the Rings are trash because they're not written a certain way. Every time I find it to be a nasty elitism argument, where some nerds like to think of themselves as superior to other nerds based on some standard which ultimately comes down to personal taste.
Tastes are equal. Popularity measures how many people have similar tastes.
The game isn't being designed any more or less "by commitee" than any prior version of the game. It is being designed using big data focused on user desires, which is a sound approach to producing a design that works for users.Tastes are not equal in all things. A lion's and gazelle's tastes in dinner doesn't mean a happy dining experience for both. Designing a game by committee might be popular, but the whole is less than sum of its parts.