MGibster
Legend
I went into it with the understanding that I'd be watching a turd, so I wasn't angry.The Last Jedi.
I went into it with the understanding that I'd be watching a turd, so I wasn't angry.The Last Jedi.
I've read this sentence a few times, but I have no idea what it means.Yeah, but the "do we duplicate the core material or not?" question is one few game companies are going to be blase about given the strength of the reactions to it among game fanbases.
JJ went scorched earth on TLJ in the way that WotC went scorched earth on 4E. In JJ's case, it feels very much like he was mad at Johnson's choices, but if he had felt that strongly about it, he should have asked to do the second film to begin with.
The Empire Strike Back was really shocking when it came out and incredibly controversial and did the same sort of smashing up the (much more limited) canon that TLJ did. It's just that took place decades ago now, and I think people don't remember that Obi-Wan being a liar and Darth Vader being Luke's dad and the hint that there was another hope if Luke fell were all wild changes to what we thought we knew at the time.
I think Johnson misjudged Disney, JJ and a large portion of the fandom in trying to pull of something similar in the middle of the sequel trilogy. "Rey is nobody," "we're killing Snoke halfway through the film" and "the entire Resistance can fit inside a single starship now" are all huge swings that I think could have really paid off if JJ hadn't gotten his nose out of joint and Disney hadn't screamed "for the love of God, just give them all the fan service," which didn't end up working either.
I've read this sentence a few times, but I have no idea what it means.
Those many fans should be catered to in other parts of the franchise. The core film saga is telling a story that has always heavily focused on the Jedi.JJ went scorched earth on TLJ in the way that WotC went scorched earth on 4E. In JJ's case, it feels very much like he was mad at Johnson's choices, but if he had felt that strongly about it, he should have asked to do the second film to begin with.
That's a valid take, but I don't think it's the only take. Prior to people saying this post-TLJ, it never occured to me that Star Wars was about the Skywalkers, so much as one father and his children were a key part of the story. It's a big galaxy, and I think for many fans, everything not-Jedi is what they love. (Well, until The Book of Boba Fett came along to explain that, no, you really don't want to focus on all that other stuff, either.)
The way they handled Hux in all three movies was weird. Either Hux should have clearly been in charge post-Snoke or Kylo should have been. An interplanetary empire can't just run on inertia.
The Empire Strike Back was really shocking when it came out and incredibly controversial and did the same sort of smashing up the (much more limited) canon that TLJ did. It's just that took place decades ago now, and I think people don't remember that Obi-Wan being a liar and Darth Vader being Luke's dad and the hint that there was another hope if Luke fell were all wild changes to what we thought we knew at the time.
I think Johnson misjudged Disney, JJ and a large portion of the fandom in trying to pull of something similar in the middle of the sequel trilogy. "Rey is nobody," "we're killing Snoke halfway through the film" and "the entire Resistance can fit inside a single starship now" are all huge swings that I think could have really paid off if JJ hadn't gotten his nose out of joint and Disney hadn't screamed "for the love of God, just give them all the fan service," which didn't end up working either.
It was (in some ways) a good movie, if you could look at it independently of its place as "episode 8". But you just can't.I really liked The Last Jedi. It is very much in keeping with Lucas' original vision of Star Wars as an exploration of Joseph Campbell's Hero's Journey. Yeah, Luke's not perfect and he fell on his face. It happens.
See also Wolfram von Eisenbach's "Parsival."