RoughCoronet0
Dragon Lover
I’m probably an outlier in these forums in that I do like a majority of the direction the revised PhB material is going and am excited to get my hands on the book in order to use the new rules and improved mechanics. However, there is at least on thing I’m upset isn’t going to be making it through to the revised book.
While I’m not as upset as some other that they are forgoing the uniformed subclass progression for all classes, I still annoyed at keeping the old subclass progression of the Bard, Rogue, and Sorcerer. I don’t understand why the Bard only gets three levels of subclass features while the others get 4 or more (I think it’s the fighter that gets the most at 5). I also don’t understand why the Rogue doesn’t get their second subclass feature until 9th level and the Sorcerer doesn’t get their third subclass feature until 14th level, 8 levels after their second one. These are the classes I really think benefited the most from the uniform level progression, and I’m probably going to rework them a little so they better match the rest of the classes subclass progression.
While I’m not as upset as some other that they are forgoing the uniformed subclass progression for all classes, I still annoyed at keeping the old subclass progression of the Bard, Rogue, and Sorcerer. I don’t understand why the Bard only gets three levels of subclass features while the others get 4 or more (I think it’s the fighter that gets the most at 5). I also don’t understand why the Rogue doesn’t get their second subclass feature until 9th level and the Sorcerer doesn’t get their third subclass feature until 14th level, 8 levels after their second one. These are the classes I really think benefited the most from the uniform level progression, and I’m probably going to rework them a little so they better match the rest of the classes subclass progression.