I would consider that a mistake as it gives credence to the idea that the two versions are not compatible after allwe'll start seeing a schedule of re-releasing lightly updated adventure books, starting with Curse of Strahd and the other most popular books to the new trade dress.
You would think so, but the D&D team has been trained on milking Forgotten Realms (like GW and space marines...). It would be nice to see more GH adventures ... Temple of Elemental Evil, Slavers, GDQ, the Lendore Isle series, Mordenkainen's Fantasic Adventure - there's a lot they could draw from, even the old adventure seeds in the Glossography (the Mist Golem would be my choice).Wouldn't they want to make something focused on Greyhawk (GH) since part of that is in the new DMG? Something like the Saltmarsh book, but more GH like the L series with Bone Hill and Assassin's Knot along with a town like Restenford. This would be a cool level 1-10 campaign book.
plenty, under NPCsWill the 2025 MM contain an entry for humans?
plenty, under NPCs
I think that stopped being a thing after the outcry over Neanderthal back in 3.5E's Frostburn.I was hoping for an entry in the same way that other monsters have an entry.
Wait, what? Neanderthal/cave man was a standard for D&D.I think that stopped being a thing after the outcry over Neanderthal back in 3.5E's Frostburn.
I think releasing an update of any previously published 5e adventure would be the absolute dumbest thing WotC could do in the next year, since they've stated over and over again that the old stuff will work just fine.I don't think we're getting any updated modules. The best I think for that is some of those monsters make it into future products. WotC isn't going to perpetuate the old books are invalid argument, but they will put out updated info in new products.