FitzTheRuke
Legend
I meant that extremely tongue-in-cheek.I don't. When Treantmonk and d4 discussed that topic, they surprisingly strongly disagreed with each other, with d4 thinking Sorcerer has overtaken Wizard.
I meant that extremely tongue-in-cheek.I don't. When Treantmonk and d4 discussed that topic, they surprisingly strongly disagreed with each other, with d4 thinking Sorcerer has overtaken Wizard.
You both misspelled "Twilight Cleric".You misspelled "paladin".
They want you to be a bladelock but be costly to make up for being a "full" caster.Weird that they would go to all that effort, instead of just removing the 3rd attack...
WOTC doesn't want casters to replace martials.
Having listened to D4s video of classes and subclasses, I think the Archfey Warlock is going to be the most powerful character in the new book.You both misspelled "Twilight Cleric".
What, and make a penalty which actually harms casters? Not on your life.Man, I really thought that they wouldn't miss that loophole, but it looks like they did. I'm gonna have to houserule it.
Yeah, about my reaction as well.
Hmm. I might have to do that too. No reason why effects coming from exhausted creatures shouldn't be easier to resist!Man, I really thought that they wouldn't miss that loophole, but it looks like they did. I'm gonna have to houserule it.
They can, at level 1.I believe any Warlock gets Charisma on attacks with pact of Blade (could be wrong). I would think this would make Hexblade obsolete, especially since you would not get Hex Warrior until level 3.
Maybe for tier 1, but by level 11 wizards are clearly out shining them (and probably even before).You both misspelled "Twilight Cleric".