borringman
Explorer
Because if for no other reason, the quoted language is awfully specific. It's not typically how someone summarizes a concept.
Not at my table!does that give me the invisible condition?
Of course you can. Doing so may initiatie combat, and then be governed by the rules of combat, otherwise they would be adjucated by the DM.Wait, I cannot attack or cast a spell outside combat? Those are combat actions!
What @borringman said.Walking out into the open ended stealth before, so why do you think it's not RAI to do it now?
so exactly what I gain from the invisible condition, in other words hiding outside of combat is indistinguishable from the Hide actionIf your intent was to ambush, you would have 'Surprise' and get advantage on your initative roll (and possibly start combat with the Invisible condition
I expect that's what the "enemy finds you" line is supposed to be. You walk out in the open and they find you.What @borringman said.
If RAI was for it to work like in 2014, they could have just left it like that. Instead, they re-wrote the rule, in a way that seems to suggest hiding makes you invisible until someone finds you with a successful perception check. The RAW seems clear to me, and I see no reason to suspect it isn’t also RAI. It’s just incredibly stupid RAW/RAI.
they are combat actions. Can’t do combat actions outside combat was your position.Of course you can. Doing so may initiatie combat, and then be governed by the rules of combat, otherwise they would be adjucated by the DM.
Well I suppose someone can cast detect invisibility or some such.I expect that's what the "enemy finds you" line is supposed to be. You walk out in the open and they find you.
They just didn't think "oh wait, they can't because you're invisible".