What did Led Zeppelin do? I mean, we’re talking about all four of them, right?Personally, I view him like I do David Eddings, or Michael Jackson, or Led Zepplin.
What did Led Zeppelin do? I mean, we’re talking about all four of them, right?Personally, I view him like I do David Eddings, or Michael Jackson, or Led Zepplin.
Aside from shtupping groupies (probably without checking their IDs)? Mostly accusations of plagiarism, I think.What did Led Zeppelin do? I mean, we’re talking about all four of them, right?
Presumably they were complicit in Jimmy Page kidnapping and raping 13-16 year old Lori Maddix.What did Led Zeppelin do? I mean, we’re talking about all four of them, right?
Well dang, guess I gotta get to Googling that one!Presumably they were complicit in Jimmy Page kidnapping and raping 13-16 year old Lori Maddix.
I met Gary once at a Gencon in Kenosa outside when I was smoking a cigarette. The 10-15 minutes we chatted without me even knowing who he was (could not see the name on his badge until finished smoking) was good.
Other than that, I really like the game system he was a primary inventor on and I don't expect that he was perfect. I don't understand the handwringing and agnst some have today. Harlot table? Well, seedy cities tend to have such on the street in many of the fiction series around when he wrote the game. And maybe he started it for RPG, but wargamers love tables ...
Considering some early designers have been outed for being Nazis and other much bigger issues, it amazes me that old forum posts are trotted out like he is the source of all evil today. Yeah, I wince a little when I read some of it but I was an adult when those posts were written and it is not like it was weird fringe beliefs or something.
Methinks you have some catching up to do. This has been addressed, and eloquently, on these forums many times; and Gygax's own words, given to us from as early as some of his pre-1e writings to as late as (I want to say) the 00s, here on this very forum, make a pretty damning indictment as regards his attitudes towards women and girls- even set against the context of his times.The accusations of misogyny against Gary Gygax, the co-creator of Dungeons & Dragons (D&D), have sparked significant debate in recent discussions about the game's legacy. To evaluate these claims fairly and comprehensively, it is crucial to place Gygax’s opinions and attitudes within the historical and cultural context of the time in which he lived and worked. Doing so not only clarifies the nuances of this debate but also highlights the dangers of judging historical figures through a contemporary lens.
1. The Historical Context of Gygax's Views
Gary Gygax developed D&D during the 1970s, a period when societal norms surrounding gender were markedly different from those of today. American society, much like the broader Western world, was dominated by traditional views on gender roles. Women were often seen in limited capacities—as wives, mothers, and homemakers—with fewer opportunities for career advancement or public expression compared to men. This cultural backdrop influenced many individuals, including Gygax, whose views were shaped, in part, by these prevailing norms.
However, it is important to distinguish between culturally absorbed attitudes and active misogyny. Misogyny, in its strictest sense, involves a deliberate aversion to or discrimination against women, implying a conscious intent. In Gygax’s case, while some of his comments may be considered problematic by today’s standards, there is no clear evidence that he actively promoted the exclusion or marginalization of women within the D&D community.
And stopped female pcs from having stats equal to males.In fact, the game itself, from its inception, attracted female players and allowed women to engage in a creative space that was, at the time, predominantly male.
His racism was disturbing at the time. There are records of some of his contemporaries being highly uncomfortable with it. Lovecraft, while a seminal author who massively influenced both fantasy and horror, was a bigot through and through. That doesn't change the power and impact of his writings, but if you view them with the knowledge that he was racist, the bigotry really shows.2. The Danger of Anachronistic Judgments: Examples from Other Authors
To illustrate the complexity of judging historical figures by modern standards, consider the following examples:
H.P. Lovecraft
H.P. Lovecraft, one of the most influential horror writers of the 20th century, is frequently criticized for his racist views, which were explicitly expressed in his writings and personal correspondence. Lovecraft lived during a time of racial segregation, and his racism, while disturbing today, was unfortunately common among many of his contemporaries. Despite these views, his literary impact and the creation of the Cthulhu Mythos remain significant.
-something NOBODY is suggesting, by the way, at least nobody in this thread (unless I missed it).In conclusion, when evaluating the accusations of misogyny against Gary Gygax, it is essential to adopt a balanced and historically informed approach. Recognizing that his views may reflect the standards of his time does not excuse any problematic behavior but instead helps us understand the complexities of the context in which he lived. Comparing Gygax with other historical authors like H.P. Lovecraft, Rudyard Kipling, James Fenimore Cooper, and William Shakespeare shows the danger of judging past figures by today’s standards. Rather than reducing Gygax’s legacy to these criticisms
Am I the only one whose AI detector just went off?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.