Just read the article. I think the points they made seem reasonable just in my cursory look at the DMG and notes I've gotten from other people.
But I do agree that the "this book sucks, but our book is great here!" over and over in the article is not a good look. It doesn't feel like a review, it does feel like I marketing gimmick disguised as a review.
If they had just noted the review here with no comparisons to their own product....likely would have been reasonable. But this direct comparison as presented is in bad taste to me.
But I do agree that the "this book sucks, but our book is great here!" over and over in the article is not a good look. It doesn't feel like a review, it does feel like I marketing gimmick disguised as a review.
If they had just noted the review here with no comparisons to their own product....likely would have been reasonable. But this direct comparison as presented is in bad taste to me.