Elon Musk Calls for Wizards of the Coast to "Burn in Hell" Over Making of Original D&D Passages

Status
Not open for further replies.
elon musk.png


Elon Musk, the owner of the app formerly known as Twitter, is calling on Wizards of the Coast and its parent company Hasbro to "burn in hell" for the publication of Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons. On November 21st, former gaming executive turned culture warrior Mark Hern posted several passages from Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons on Twitter, criticizing the book for providing context about some of the misogyny and cultural insensitivity found in early rulebooks. These passages were pulled from the foreword written by Jason Tondro, a senior designer for the D&D team who also worked extensively on the book. Hern stated that these passages, along with the release of the new 2024 Player's Handbook and Dungeon Master's Guide for D&D's "40th anniversary" (it is actually D&D's 50th anniversary) both "erased and slandered" Gary Gygax and other creators of Dungeons & Dragons.

In response, Musk wrote "Nobody, and I mean nobody, gets to trash E. Gary Gygax and the geniuses who created Dungeons & Dragons. What the [naughty word] is wrong with Hasbro and WoTC?? May they burn in hell." Musk had played Dungeons & Dragons at some point in his youth, but it's unclear when the last time he ever played the game.

Nobody, and I mean nobody, gets to trash E. Gary Gygax and the geniuses who created Dungeons & Dragons. What the [xxxx] is wrong with Hasbro and WoTC?? May they burn in hell.
- Elon Musk​

Notably, Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons contains countless correspondences and letters written by both Gygax and Dave Arneson, including annotated copies of early D&D rulesets. Most early D&D rules supplements as well as early Dragon magazines are also found in the book. It seems odd to contain one of the most extensive compliations of Gygax's work an "erasure," but it's unclear whether Hern or Musk actually read the book given the incorrect information about the anniversary.

Additionally, Gygax and Arneson are both credited in the 2024 Player's Handbook and Dungeon Master's Guide. The exact credit reads: "Building on the original game created by Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson and then developed by many others over the past 50 years." Wizards of the Coast also regularly collaborates with Gygax's youngest son Luke and is a participant at Gary Con, a convention held in Gygax's honor. The opening paragraph of the 2024 Player's Handbook is written by Jeremy Crawford and specifically lauds both Gygax and Arneson for making Dungeons & Dragons and contains an anecdote about Crawford meeting Gygax.

Musk has increasingly leaned into culture war controversies in recent years, usually amplifying misinformation to suit his own political agenda.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad

I bolded the part you edited out, below.

I'm sorry I didn't include your meaningless clarification, which has no holding on what was said previously? Again, if you want to use it as an exit, feel free. But it doesn't really mean anything when you were the guy to first use the words and then get offended when they got shot back at you. Putting in a mealy-mouthed "if they were" when you've been talking about Wizards establishing an "absolute truth" just comes off as a bit insincere.
 

I wonder if Gygax was doing what we'd today call "trolling"; writing something deliberately provocative to get a reaction from people. If so, then going by the lenght of this thread and the other bruhaha on the net, he's being a pretty successful troll even from the grave.

CR 18 Greater Undead Troll?

The Rule of Goats feels appropriate.
 

I think they are saying it, but indirectly. I don't infer it from the evidence. Rather by what they said. Passive voice or otherwise.

What they said, their words, are the evidence you are inferring from.

The words "Gary Gygax was sexist" do not appear in the passage. His name is not there. The word "sexist" is not there. So, you must be processing what they do say, and coming to the conclusion, "They are saying that Gary, personally, was sexist."

That thought process is what we call "inference".
 

I'm sorry I didn't include your meaningless clarification, which has no holding on what was said previously? Again, if you want to use it as an exit, feel free. But it doesn't really mean anything when you were the guy to first use the words and then get offended when they got shot back at you. Putting in a mealy-mouthed "if they were" when you've been talking about Wizards establishing an "absolute truth" just comes off as a bit insincere.

So if it was so meaningless, why did you edit it out?
I thought you said you didn't edit it out:

I didn't carefully edit any part out, but if that allows you to duck the debate, I suppose you can use that as an excuse!

Which one is it?
 

I wonder if Gygax was doing what we'd today call "trolling"; writing something deliberately provocative to get a reaction from people. If so, then going by the lenght of this thread and the other bruhaha on the net, he's being a pretty successful troll even from the grave.

CR 18 Greater Undead Troll?

Let’s get it over with already and give Gygax a stat block so we can defeat him in our next D&D game!
 

So if it was so meaningless, why did you edit it out?

I deleted them because there was nothing to comment on them?

I mean, it's a meaningless hedge and I don't quote things I'm not going to comment on. I just didn't take seriously that your entire statement hinged on a "if they are" when you've been talking about how this is a betrayal of the man and such, which is pretty damn strong language to use when you apparently aren't even sure of WotC's intentions.

I thought you said you didn't edit it out:



Which one is it?

Honestly it's that I forgot that you even said that because it came across as such a meaningless and insincere hedge that I didn't even register it as important.
 


Did you ever consider that WotC understands their audience much better than you do and just maybe they did pick the option that loses them the least amount of customers?
I think this approach is not proving to be a winning strategy for most companies lately
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top