That’s a a fun and pithy sound bite (well done!), but it’s fundamental misunderstanding of the point.Humans survived for thousands of years without fire...
That’s a a fun and pithy sound bite (well done!), but it’s fundamental misunderstanding of the point.Humans survived for thousands of years without fire...
Why thank you! * bows *That’s a a fun and pithy sound bite (well done!)...
I don't think so....but it’s fundamental misunderstanding of the point.
That was a fact germaine to the point, but no, that isn't the point. So yes, you have fundamentally misunderstood the point. But I'm not her to convert AI stans--I know that is impossible, and attempting to do so is a waste of my time and energy--I'm speaking more to those reading this. Hopefully, they got the point!I don't think so.
I think the point was that some indie publishers were able to produce some illustrations without relying on AI generation.
The problem with that model is the moment you start taking and spending other people's money your project becomes a time-sensitive employment-like commitment rather than a hobby or a labour of love that you can do (or not do) at your own pace.That's what Kickstarters were for- raising money to create something that you couldn't afford to without it. Crowdfunding a project.
We’re talking about indie publishers. If you plan to sell it, it’s a business proposition with all that that entails. From the moment you accept money for it, it’s not just a hobby or labour of love. If it’s just for your own personal use, then this conversation isn’t even relevant.The problem with that model is the moment you start taking and spending other people's money your project becomes a time-sensitive employment-like commitment rather than a hobby or a labour of love that you can do (or not do) at your own pace.
No thanks.
We’re talking about indie publishers. If you plan to sell it, it’s a business proposition with all that that entails. From the moment you accept money for it, it’s not just a hobby or labour of love. If it’s just for your own personal use, then this conversation isn’t even relevant.
I had to explicitly prompt for "a female demon with the lower body of a snake, the upper body of a woman and 6 arms" Just asking for "a Marilith" gave me a woman with blue skin, pointy horns and ears and spiky armor, so the model does appear to have a vague idea that a Marilith is a female demon, but doesn't know what one actually looks like.
What about asking for 4 wings instead? Just wondering how that would change things.Totally ignoring the "with two pairs of wings" part of the "an angel with two pairs of wings" prompt...