Recent content by Daeinar

Busy, aren't we? ;) Daeinar

Well, I got mine on saturday. Of course, I'm from Germany. :p Just in case you're capable of reading german, check out the review here: http://www.dnd-gate.de/gate3/page/index.php?id=616 And in case you're not, someone was kind enough to translate ist over here. Starts on page 2, I guess...

Actually, they'd expect to pay 4000 GP, since Enlarge Person has it's duration measured in minutes. ;) Apart from that, I can only second kreynolds statement. Just apply a little common sense. The "guidelines - not rules" thing might not fit each aspect of the D&D Game equally. But it certainly...

Confusing the player's, justifying an upcoming product on item creation, which will in turn confuse everyone so much as to justify a 4th edition? :rolleyes: Dunno. But the intent seems to be unclear at best. Daeinar -Have fun, and know the rules before you try to fix them.

Oh, I found an item that nicely suports the "multiply secondary powers by 1.5" interpretation from the sidebar. Juts look up "Gloves of Swimming and Climbing". 2.500+2.500*1,5=6.250 And those underwent a revision, to be sure. Daeinar -Have fun, and know the rules before you try to fix them.

I couldn't agree more. The "behind the curtain text" is no leftover from 3.0E. It underwent a significant change. Of course, we cannot tell which one's wrong from the Revision Team's perspective - the sidebar or the table.:rolleyes: But the table entry just doesn't make any sense at all...

Re: Re: Uhm... no Oh my... misread. Well, we don't have to discuss the fact how broken the Half-Ogre is at LA +1, have we? But that doesn't make Enlarge Person a badly balanced spell. ;) The Revised Core Rules do not contain a single Humanoid creature of larger then size M, and the RMM...

Uhm... no You're wrong in all cases. But just reading the spell descreption would help a lot. Enlarge Person gives you what is mentioned in the description. A +2 enlargement bonus to strength, a -2 enlargement penalty to dex, and the size penalty on AC and attack rolls for the new size. And...

1.) How many players in your group? 6. 5 Players, 1 DM. 2.) Do you DM? Yes. 3.) Do other people in the group DM, and how many? No. 4.) What's the Male/Female composition of the group? Only males. 5.) Got a good gamestore near you and what is it? No. 6.) Mainly modules or homebrew...

Well, now that Erik has made clear that writing something her is not futile... Over the past few days I have talked to several friends and fellow players about the whole Dragon/Dungeon thing. The conclusion was, so far, that Dungeon has -at least for a majority of the people I talked to, myself...

As someone who is not a native English speaker, the extensive use of the word "nerfed" really somehow concerned me - until I found out that it does not mean "totally useless" as opposed to simply (and imo reasonably) "weaker".:D

Well that's basically it. BTW, now that 9 out of 10 Prestige Classes are definitely more powerful than any core class, I don't get the point of the complaint. After all, you cannot expect to have a distinguishable character, if you always need Spellcasting Prodigy, Weapon Finesse or Evasion...

I'd say the ability allows you to reroll all the dice. If you hit someone with a greatsword your damage roll is still 2d6, and I think using the power to reroll only one of the dice seems a bit strange... But I see your Point, Greathouse, since rerolling 20 dice of a high level damage spell...

Yes he could. He could of course use arrows with heads crafted from stone. Would make a bit more sense than using wholly wooden arrows... There must be sume rule for stone weapons, I'm pretty sure I read something about that. Just can't remember where it was...

You get BOTH.